[Rubygems-developers] Reviewing the Tattle Data (was RubyGems plaform thread)
drnicwilliams at gmail.com
Wed Apr 25 05:56:51 EDT 2007
I also don't imagine the graphs showing significant deployment data, vs
development box data. Thus all the mswin/darwin results.
On 4/25/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs at dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Jim Weirich wrote:
> > Eric Hodel wrote:
> > > On Apr 23, 2007, at 19:14, Jim Weirich wrote:
> > >
> > >> I haven't seen the results of tattle yet (perhaps Chad would like
> > >> to share the gathered data)
> > >
> > > Its downloadable from: http://tattle.rubygarden.org/
> I don't see a download there, but I see a display of this
> information. Incidentally, the graph bars don't work with large
> print, which bleeds outside them and then gets out of sync with
> them. I expect that is not easy to fix. SVG perhaps?
> > Thanks.
> > Going over the tattle data is interesting. And it raises a number of
> > questions.
> > (3) Sheesh, 17% of the respondents are running RubyGems 0.8.11. Just
> > haven't upgraded? ... or technical issues with later version causing
> > problems? (inquiring minds want to know).
> We don't know from what is displayed when these readings were taken.
> I haven't run tattle for ages. I'd suggest a link on that page
> to instructions, because I've forgotten what to do. A 3D graph
> showing time might be interesting, but nontrivial to produce
> Rubygems-developers mailing list
> Rubygems-developers at rubyforge.org
Dr Nic Williams
(p) +61 7 3102 3237 (Finds me anywhere in the world, via Skype)
(m) +4673 768 1389 (Swedish mobile)
(f) +61 7 3305 7572 (sends fax to my email)
Björnsonsgatan 153, 16 844 Bromma, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rubygems-developers