[Rubygems-developers] The replacement for 'require_gem'
gregory.t.brown at gmail.com
Thu Apr 6 15:53:34 EDT 2006
On 4/5/06, Jim Weirich <jim at weirichhouse.org> wrote:
> We've been talking about a replacement for 'require_gem' that does not
> do the auto-requiring. Several names have been suggested (e.g.
> Here's what I'm leaning towards:
> require "rubygems"
> gem 'rails', '= 1.0.0'
> gem 'rake', '= 0.7.0.1'
> gem 'activesupport', '= 1.2.5'
> gem 'activerecord', '= 1.13.2'
> gem 'actionpack', '= 1.11.2'
> gem 'actionmailer', '= 1.1.5'
> gem 'actionwebservice', '= 1.0.0'
> I like it because I don't have to explain what 'activate' means :)
Otherwise, just gem sounds okay.
More information about the Rubygems-developers