[Rubygems-developers] The replacement for 'require_gem'
Jim Weirich
jim at weirichhouse.org
Wed Apr 5 12:53:52 EDT 2006
We've been talking about a replacement for 'require_gem' that does not
do the auto-requiring. Several names have been suggested (e.g.
activate_gem).
Here's what I'm leaning towards:
require "rubygems"
gem 'rails', '= 1.0.0'
gem 'rake', '= 0.7.0.1'
gem 'activesupport', '= 1.2.5'
gem 'activerecord', '= 1.13.2'
gem 'actionpack', '= 1.11.2'
gem 'actionmailer', '= 1.1.5'
gem 'actionwebservice', '= 1.0.0'
I like it because I don't have to explain what 'activate' means :)
Comments?
--
-- Jim Weirich jweirich at one.net http://onestepback.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)
More information about the Rubygems-developers
mailing list