[Rubygems-developers] gem server horked?

Chad Fowler chad at chadfowler.com
Mon Oct 17 17:50:03 EDT 2005

On 17-Oct-05, at 5:35 PM, Tom Copeland wrote:

> On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 17:30 -0400, Austin Ziegler wrote:
>> On 10/17/05, Tom Copeland <tom at infoether.com> wrote:
>>> The problem is that RubyForge is on a relatively small network
>>> connection - 768K.  Mirroring out large files helps tremendously,  
>>> but
>>> there's still a ton of content being served through that pipe.
>> What would it take for RubyGems to recognise a 302-redirect and be
>> mirrored the same way that everything else is on RubyForge, leaving
>> the real bandwidth of RubyForge to the website?
> * tom defers to Gems fellas...

We could actually do it with the builtin "sources" feature.  We just  
need to get round-robining thrown in and do a release.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubygems-developers/attachments/20051017/462a348b/attachment.htm

More information about the Rubygems-developers mailing list