[Rubygems-developers] gem server horked?
Chad Fowler
chad at chadfowler.com
Mon Oct 17 17:50:03 EDT 2005
On 17-Oct-05, at 5:35 PM, Tom Copeland wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 17:30 -0400, Austin Ziegler wrote:
>
>> On 10/17/05, Tom Copeland <tom at infoether.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The problem is that RubyForge is on a relatively small network
>>> connection - 768K. Mirroring out large files helps tremendously,
>>> but
>>> there's still a ton of content being served through that pipe.
>>>
>>
>> What would it take for RubyGems to recognise a 302-redirect and be
>> mirrored the same way that everything else is on RubyForge, leaving
>> the real bandwidth of RubyForge to the website?
>>
>
> * tom defers to Gems fellas...
>
We could actually do it with the builtin "sources" feature. We just
need to get round-robining thrown in and do a release.
Chad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubygems-developers/attachments/20051017/462a348b/attachment.htm
More information about the Rubygems-developers
mailing list