[Rubygems-developers] --rdoc option does not have an effect
drbrain at segment7.net
Mon Jun 6 02:06:58 EDT 2005
On 05 Jun 2005, at 21:38, Lothar Scholz wrote:
> Monday, June 6, 2005, 7:21:08 AM, you wrote:
>>> the first has no "s.has_rdoc" defined in the specifiction the
>>> latter has
>>> "s.has_rdoc = nil". No matter what arguments, xml-simple is always
>>> installed without RDoc, BlueCloth always with RDoc. This does not
>>> sense to me.
> EH> If a gem has no rdoc (xml-simple), rubygems can't suddenly make it
> EH> appear.
> Sorry of course it can. It will just list the things dectected by
> analysing the source code. It is only a problem when the is code is a
> compiled binary library but this is not the case in my examples.
> Thats why there is an option like the force rdoc generation.
> And it does not work (also tried the "gem rdoc xml-simple" command).
> I must do this manually by calling "rdoc <gemlibpath>".
> So it is very clear that this is an Error in RubyGems.
return if @spec.has_rdoc == false
and I disagree that rubygems should ever second-guess the gem author.
Eric Hodel - drbrain at segment7.net - http://segment7.net
FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E 7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04
More information about the Rubygems-developers