[Rubygems-developers] require_gem/autorequire vs require.

Hugh Sasse hgs at dmu.ac.uk
Thu Jun 2 10:15:36 EDT 2005

On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Bill Guindon wrote:

> On 6/2/05, Hugh Sasse <hgs at dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Jim Freeze wrote:
>>> Here is a list of possible names that I have seen (and some orthogonal
>>> counterparts that I have added)
>>> 01) require_gem +
>>> 02) gem_require +
>>> 03) select_gem +++

I forgot to state explicity that those + chars I added were my vote.
I should have done something to the quoting, to avoid false
>> I think I prefer the ones that integrate the whole gem business into
>> ruby, without having to specify Gem::something or Gem.sumeoting.
> Funny you should use that word, as Gem.specify was running through my mind.

Yes, that would be good too.

More information about the Rubygems-developers mailing list