[Rubygems-developers] Another plug for Simon's patch
David A. Black
dblack at wobblini.net
Wed Mar 31 17:30:11 EST 2004
Hi --
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Jim Weirich wrote:
>
> David A. Black said:
> > In any case, > x by itself doesn't/shouldn't
> > have any implications beyond > x.
>
> How about a syntax like this ...
>
> require_gem 'log4r', "1.*"
>
> It would match any version 1.0, 1.1, 1.5.4.3.5, etc. But version 2.0
> would not match.
I like that a lot. Much better than the proliferation of <>=....
David
--
David A. Black
dblack at wobblini.net
More information about the Rubygems-developers
mailing list