[Rubygems-developers] Another plug for Simon's patch

David A. Black dblack at wobblini.net
Wed Mar 31 17:30:11 EST 2004


Hi --

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Jim Weirich wrote:

> 
> David A. Black said:
> > In any case, > x by itself doesn't/shouldn't
> > have any implications beyond > x.
> 
> How about a syntax like this ...
> 
>   require_gem 'log4r', "1.*"
> 
> It would match any version 1.0, 1.1, 1.5.4.3.5, etc.  But version 2.0
> would not match.

I like that a lot.  Much better than the proliferation of <>=....


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack at wobblini.net



More information about the Rubygems-developers mailing list