[Rubygems-developers] [Fwd: Re: R: rubygems undefined
method'loaded_from=' for nil::NilClass]
rich at infoether.com
Wed Jul 14 10:45:27 EDT 2004
On 7/14/04 10:32 AM, "Chad Fowler" <chad at chadfowler.com> wrote:
> # One question ... Why are the gemspecs in the specification directory
> # stored as ruby source. I would have thought that YAML would be a more
> # appropriate choice in this area. Is it worth changing?
> I think so, too. I'm not sure why they're stored as Ruby source, but I
> think it would actually simplify the code a bit if they weren't. Anyone
> else have an opinion? Otherwise, I think it's worth changing.
They are stored as Ruby source so that a runtime user of RubyGems does not
need to load YAML in order to use libraries. If they are YAML, you have to
load it and the native SYCK parser. That is a lot to ask of someone who
just wants to load libraries...that is the thinking anyway.
More information about the Rubygems-developers