[Rubygems-developers] gem format
batsman.geo at yahoo.com
Sat Jul 10 14:44:43 EDT 2004
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 06:19:29PM -0400, Jim Weirich wrote:
> I have no problem with changing the format. Here are a couple of points ...
> (1) We need to rev the gem format. The gem format revision should
> explicitly be part of the file, and we should be able to detect the
> revision given an gem file of unknown format. This gem format revision
> is separate from the gem software revision.
The new format could be versioned easily. The gem format can be specified
either in the metadata section or as a separate entry in the "outer
> (2) Old revisions need to be supported, at least for a time. I know our
> software is currently beta, but we have over 50 individual projects
> available as gems right now. If changing the format of the file
> disrupts this, I think this would be a PR failure.
You could drop write support for the old format and just keep the
ability to read it.
> (3) Yes, please, whatever you do, get rid of the ruby code at the front
> of the gem file.
This is also a must if you plan to implement package signatures.
> (4) The tar/gzip utilities donated by Mauricio ... are they portable
> across all our platforms?
The code has been tested on several Linux distributions, FreeBSD,
different flavors of win32 and OSX.
I have read builder.rb & format.rb and I think this won't take too much
work. I will prepare a preliminary patch.
Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com
Debian is like Suse with yast turned off, just better. :)
-- Goswin Brederlow
More information about the Rubygems-developers