From ivorpaul at gmail.com  Thu Apr  5 11:11:32 2007
From: ivorpaul at gmail.com (Ivor Paul)
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:11:32 +0200
Subject: [Rubyamf-discussion] toturial worked - rails?
Message-ID: <dea6f0090704050811y73fda6dfjdf708194f2438f00@mail.gmail.com>

HI All

I worked through the tutorial and it works nicely. I was wondering if anyone
has applied this to rails applications?

Regards
Ivor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubyamf-discussion/attachments/20070405/3151718e/attachment.html 

From beingthexemplary at gmail.com  Thu Apr  5 11:43:56 2007
From: beingthexemplary at gmail.com (Aaron Smith)
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:43:56 -0400
Subject: [Rubyamf-discussion] toturial worked - rails?
In-Reply-To: <dea6f0090704050811y73fda6dfjdf708194f2438f00@mail.gmail.com>
References: <dea6f0090704050811y73fda6dfjdf708194f2438f00@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4615193C.8000707@gmail.com>

Yes I've done some simple rails integration. Although I am not 
specifically targeting rails integration with rubyamf. I'm wanting to 
keep it free of rails for now. Although rails is sweet, I think having 
an option that doesn't have to rely an an entire rails application is 
smart. More work needs to be done with optimization and speed before 
weborb like rails integration is added. RubyInline with inline C is in 
the works to speed up AMF deserialization and serialization.

Currently the best way to integrate rails with rubyamf is to change the 
services path to a (myrailsap/app/services) folder, then you would 
utilize the controllers and models from the existing rails application.

-Aaron





Ivor Paul wrote:
> HI All
>
> I worked through the tutorial and it works nicely. I was wondering if 
> anyone has applied this to rails applications?
>
> Regards
> Ivor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rubyamf-discussion mailing list
> Rubyamf-discussion at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubyamf-discussion
>   

From beingthexemplary at gmail.com  Thu Apr  5 12:07:08 2007
From: beingthexemplary at gmail.com (Aaron Smith)
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:07:08 -0400
Subject: [Rubyamf-discussion] toturial worked - rails?
In-Reply-To: <dea6f0090704050853t3099d564o6485fd44a1893f82@mail.gmail.com>
References: <dea6f0090704050811y73fda6dfjdf708194f2438f00@mail.gmail.com>	
	<4615193C.8000707@gmail.com>
	<dea6f0090704050853t3099d564o6485fd44a1893f82@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <46151EAC.1010102@gmail.com>

Ah, yes what you're wondering about 
(http://localhost:3000/controller/action), is an HTTPService. You can 
look at the Ruby on Rails RIA SDK from Adobe for examples of that.

-Aaron



Ivor Paul wrote:
> Thanks, that sounds good - although, I am expecting if I were to change
>
>             <endpoint uri="http://localhost:8024/gateway.rb" 
> class="flex.messaging.endpoints.AMFEndpoint "/>
> in the config.xml to
>
>             <endpoint uri="http://localhost:3000/controller/action" 
> class="flex.messaging.endpoints.AMFEndpoint "/>
> That the framework would look for a .rhtml/.rxml view to render 
> instead of just passing the array/string/ActiveRecord object back.
>
> I havent worked with any kind of services in rails before so I may 
> just be wholely ignorant in which case I apologise :)
> If so, can you point me to an article or two that I can read to bring 
> me up to speed?
>
> Regards
> Ivor
>
>
>
> On 4/5/07, *Aaron Smith* < beingthexemplary at gmail.com 
> <mailto:beingthexemplary at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Yes I've done some simple rails integration. Although I am not
>     specifically targeting rails integration with rubyamf. I'm wanting to
>     keep it free of rails for now. Although rails is sweet, I think having
>     an option that doesn't have to rely an an entire rails application is
>     smart. More work needs to be done with optimization and speed before
>     weborb like rails integration is added. RubyInline with inline C is in
>     the works to speed up AMF deserialization and serialization.
>
>     Currently the best way to integrate rails with rubyamf is to
>     change the
>     services path to a (myrailsap/app/services) folder, then you would
>     utilize the controllers and models from the existing rails
>     application.
>
>     -Aaron
>
>
>
>
>
>     Ivor Paul wrote:
>     > HI All
>     >
>     > I worked through the tutorial and it works nicely. I was
>     wondering if
>     > anyone has applied this to rails applications?
>     >
>     > Regards
>     > Ivor
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Rubyamf-discussion mailing list
>     > Rubyamf-discussion at rubyforge.org
>     <mailto:Rubyamf-discussion at rubyforge.org>
>     > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubyamf-discussion
>     >
>
>