[ruby-opengl-devel] Re : Requirements and Design
noteed at gmail.com
Sat Sep 2 05:12:39 EDT 2006
for swig, it's ok for me.
for the different versions stuff, i was not talking about opengl
version but ruby version (swig seems to handle them).
for the GL/Gl discussion, i think i was misunderstanding something...
now, if i understand correctly, you say 'GL' for 'GL/...' and you say
'Gl' for 'Gl.gl...' ?
2006/9/2, John Gabriele <jmg3000 at gmail.com>:
> On 9/2/06, peter mclain <peter.mclain at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Peter -- have you formed an opinion on the SWIG issue yet?
> > My only reluctance in doing it by hand is the tedium of ensuring we
> > get it *all* done.
> My guess is that it would work like so: we implement as much as we
> can. We get the sample programs running. If we missed something, we
> get a message on the ML from someone on some platform who noticed
> something missing or broken, and then fix those on a case-by-case
> basis. They might even provide a patch.
> ruby-opengl-devel mailing list
> ruby-opengl-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the ruby-opengl-devel