From alexey.chebotar at gmail.com  Mon Jun  1 04:28:12 2009
From: alexey.chebotar at gmail.com (Alexey Chebotar)
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:28:12 +0300
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Question about children with different
	objectClass
In-Reply-To: <20090531.235545.338122493853641384.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <4A1D5B1A.5000404@gmail.com>
	<20090531.235545.338122493853641384.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <4A23911C.7040005@gmail.com>

Hi.
Kouhei Sutou ?????:

> It seems that AcitveLdap's default value isn't good.
>
> What about the code?
>   test_root.delete_all(nil, :base => nil)
>   
This code does not work :(

 >> test_root.delete_all(nil, :base => nil)
TypeError: can't convert nil into String
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:179:in 
`search'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:179:in 
`block in execute'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:646:in 
`block in log'
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/benchmark.rb:309:in `realtime'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:646:in 
`log'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:179:in 
`execute'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:90:in 
`block in search'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:165:in 
`block in search'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:266:in 
`block in operation'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/timeout.rb:15:in 
`call'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/timeout.rb:15:in 
`alarm'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:312:in 
`with_timeout'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:265:in 
`operation'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:164:in 
`search'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:83:in 
`search'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/operations.rb:474:in 
`delete_all'
from (irb):6
from /usr/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'

> What about creating generic entry class?
>
>   class Entry < ActiveLdap::Base
>     ldap_mapping :prefix => "",
>                  :classes => ["top"],
>                  :scope => :sub
>   end
>
>   Entry.delete_all(:dn => test_child2.dn)
>
>   
This code also does not work

 >> test_child2 = OrgUnit.find "test_child2"
 >> Entry.delete_all(:dn => test_child2.dn)
=> nil
 >> test_child1 = OrgUnit.find "test_child1"
 >> Entry.delete_all(:dn => test_child1.dn)
=> nil


> I'm sorry but I didn't try the above suggestions.
> I don't have enough time for it..
Not a problem, I can wait :)
I found another way for destroying entries in my case..
But soon I will have problem with modify_rdn :(
I will have tree:
---
ou=test_root
|-- ou=test_child1
| |-- dc=test_domain1
| |-- ou=test_child1_child1
|-- ou=test_child2
| |-- dc=test_domain2
ou=test_root2
---
And I will need rename ou=test_child1 to ou=test_child3

 >> test_child1.modify_rdn_entry(test_child1.dn, "dc=test_child3", true, {})
ActiveLdap::LdapError::NotAllowedOnNonleaf: Operation not allowed on 
non-leaf
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap_ext.rb:80:in 
`assert_error_code'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:181:in 
`rescue in execute'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:177:in 
`execute'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:165:in 
`block in modify_rdn'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:234:in 
`block in modify_rdn'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:266:in 
`block in operation'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/timeout.rb:15:in 
`call'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/timeout.rb:15:in 
`alarm'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:312:in 
`with_timeout'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:265:in 
`operation'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:233:in 
`modify_rdn'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:160:in 
`modify_rdn'
from 
/var/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/operations.rb:504:in 
`modify_rdn_entry'
from (irb):25
from /usr/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'

P.S. ActiveLdap revision is 963


From kou at cozmixng.org  Mon Jun  1 09:49:29 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:49:29 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] problems with rails 2.3.2 and active_ldap.
In-Reply-To: <ab520d140905311207t725ae126r30758ac978986588@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ab520d140905290203r1621dc71s9760a7b8b7b938db@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090601.000024.507490017563662995.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<ab520d140905311207t725ae126r30758ac978986588@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090601.224929.1098872334715850914.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <ab520d140905311207t725ae126r30758ac978986588 at mail.gmail.com>
  "Re: [activeldap-discuss] problems with rails 2.3.2 and active_ldap." on Sun, 31 May 2009 21:07:07 +0200,
  Mauro <mrsanna1 at gmail.com> wrote:

>> You just need active_ldap gem. ActiveLdap plugin is included
>> in the gem.
> 
> Yes but....I have to use the plugin?
> The plugin alone can be donwloaded and installed so there is no need of the gem.

The plugin just provides ActiveLdap initialization on Rails
application. The gem provides both of ActiveLdap itself and
ActiveLdap initialization on Rails application.


Thanks,
--
kou


From kou at cozmixng.org  Mon Jun  1 10:10:14 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:10:14 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] 1.0.9?
Message-ID: <20090601.231014.1055929314494263631.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi Will,

Could you release the current trunk as 1.0.9?

We wanted to release 1.1.0 as the next release but we can't
release in the near future. :<
So it's better that we release 1.0.9 as 'Rails 2.3.2 support
release' before 1.1.0.


# I want to release 1.1.0 in RubyKaigi2009. :-)


Thanks,
--
kou

From wad at gmail.com  Mon Jun  1 10:29:14 2009
From: wad at gmail.com (Will Drewry)
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:29:14 -0500
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] 1.0.9?
In-Reply-To: <20090601.231014.1055929314494263631.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <20090601.231014.1055929314494263631.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <2359eed20906010729y5c1c8036v732bb59acac8bf4f@mail.gmail.com>

Hi kou,

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Kouhei Sutou <kou at cozmixng.org> wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> Could you release the current trunk as 1.0.9?

Sure - I should get to it this evening (my time :).


> We wanted to release 1.1.0 as the next release but we can't
> release in the near future. :<
> So it's better that we release 1.0.9 as 'Rails 2.3.2 support
> release' before 1.1.0.

Sounds perfect.

> # I want to release 1.1.0 in RubyKaigi2009. :-)

Awesome!

From kou at cozmixng.org  Mon Jun  1 10:41:00 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:41:00 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] 1.0.9?
In-Reply-To: <2359eed20906010729y5c1c8036v732bb59acac8bf4f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090601.231014.1055929314494263631.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<2359eed20906010729y5c1c8036v732bb59acac8bf4f@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090601.234100.949267780715482931.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <2359eed20906010729y5c1c8036v732bb59acac8bf4f at mail.gmail.com>
  "Re: 1.0.9?" on Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:29:14 -0500,
  Will Drewry <wad at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Kouhei Sutou <kou at cozmixng.org> wrote:
>> Hi Will,
>>
>> Could you release the current trunk as 1.0.9?
> 
> Sure - I should get to it this evening (my time :).

Thanks!!!

>> We wanted to release 1.1.0 as the next release but we can't
>> release in the near future. :<
>> So it's better that we release 1.0.9 as 'Rails 2.3.2 support
>> release' before 1.1.0.
> 
> Sounds perfect.
> 
>> # I want to release 1.1.0 in RubyKaigi2009. :-)
> 
> Awesome!

I hope that it will be true. ;-)


--
kou

From kou at cozmixng.org  Mon Jun  1 11:21:29 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:21:29 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Question about children with different
 objectClass
In-Reply-To: <4A23911C.7040005@gmail.com>
References: <4A1D5B1A.5000404@gmail.com>
	<20090531.235545.338122493853641384.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<4A23911C.7040005@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090602.002129.29649599483596.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

I'm sorry for my wrong suggestions.

In <4A23911C.7040005 at gmail.com>
  "Re: [activeldap-discuss] Question about children with different objectClass" on Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:28:12 +0300,
  Alexey Chebotar <alexey.chebotar at gmail.com> wrote:

>> It seems that AcitveLdap's default value isn't good.
>>
>> What about the code?
>>   test_root.delete_all(nil, :base => nil)
>>   
> This code does not work :(
> 
>>> test_root.delete_all(nil, :base => nil)
> TypeError: can't convert nil into String

What about this?
  OrgUnit.delete_all(nil, :base => test_root.dn)

>> What about creating generic entry class?
>>
>>   class Entry < ActiveLdap::Base
>>     ldap_mapping :prefix => "",
>>                  :classes => ["top"],
>>                  :scope => :sub
>>   end
>>
>>   Entry.delete_all(:dn => test_child2.dn)
>>
>>   
> This code also does not work
> 
>>> test_child2 = OrgUnit.find "test_child2"
>>> Entry.delete_all(:dn => test_child2.dn)
> => nil
>>> test_child1 = OrgUnit.find "test_child1"
>>> Entry.delete_all(:dn => test_child1.dn)
> => nil

Sorry. My code was too bad. :<

  class Entry < ActiveLdap::Base
    ldap_mapping :prefix => "",
                 :classes => ["top"],
                 :scope => :sub
    self.dn_attribute = nil
  end

  Entry.delete_all(nil, :base => test_child2.dn)

> But soon I will have problem with modify_rdn :(
> I will have tree:
> ---
> ou=test_root
> |-- ou=test_child1
> | |-- dc=test_domain1
> | |-- ou=test_child1_child1
> |-- ou=test_child2
> | |-- dc=test_domain2
> ou=test_root2
> ---
> And I will need rename ou=test_child1 to ou=test_child3
> 
>>> test_child1.modify_rdn_entry(test_child1.dn,
>>> "dc=test_child3", true, {})
> ActiveLdap::LdapError::NotAllowedOnNonleaf: Operation not
> allowed on non-leaf

I'll look at this problem later. Sorry.


Thanks,
--
kou

From alexey.chebotar at gmail.com  Mon Jun  1 11:57:11 2009
From: alexey.chebotar at gmail.com (Alexey Chebotar)
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:57:11 +0300
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Question about children with different
	objectClass
In-Reply-To: <20090602.002129.29649599483596.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <4A1D5B1A.5000404@gmail.com>	<20090531.235545.338122493853641384.kou@cozmixng.org>	<4A23911C.7040005@gmail.com>
	<20090602.002129.29649599483596.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <4A23FA57.5070006@gmail.com>

Kouhei Sutou ?????:
> OrgUnit.delete_all(nil, :base => test_root.dn)
>   
WOW! :)
This code works for both cases:

1)
ou=test_root
|-- ou=test_child1
| |-- ou=test_child1_child1
|-- ou=test_child2

 >> test_root = OrgUnit.find("test_root")
 >> test_root.delete_all(nil, :base => test_root.dn)
=> ["ou=test_child2,ou=test_root,dc=...,dc=com", 
"ou=test_child1_child1,ou=test_child1,ou=test_root,dc=...,dc=com", 
"ou=test_child1,ou=test_root,dc=...,dc=com", "ou=test_root,dc=...,dc=com"]

2)
ou=test_root
|-- ou=test_child1
| |-- dc=test_domain1
| |-- ou=test_child1_child1
|-- ou=test_child2
| |-- dc=test_domain2

test_root = OrgUnit.find("test_root")
 >> test_root.delete_all(nil, :base => test_root.dn)
=> ["dc=test_domain2,ou=test_child2,ou=test_root,dc=..,dc=com", 
"ou=test_child2,ou=test_root,dc=..,dc=com", 
"dc=test_domain1,ou=test_child1,ou=test_root,dc=..,dc=com", 
"ou=test_child1_child1,ou=test_child1,ou=test_root,dc=...,dc=com", 
"ou=test_child1,ou=test_root,dc=...,dc=com", "ou=test_root,dc=...,dc=com"]

> Sorry. My code was too bad. :<
>
>   class Entry < ActiveLdap::Base
>     ldap_mapping :prefix => "",
>                  :classes => ["top"],
>                  :scope => :sub
>     self.dn_attribute = nil
>   end
>
>   Entry.delete_all(nil, :base => test_child2.dn)
>   
This code works too :)
Many thanks


From kou at cozmixng.org  Fri Jun  5 10:32:21 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:32:21 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] 1.0.9?
In-Reply-To: <2359eed20906031850t48f1dc0au35792e5588ce68a8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2359eed20906010729y5c1c8036v732bb59acac8bf4f@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090601.234100.949267780715482931.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<2359eed20906031850t48f1dc0au35792e5588ce68a8@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090605.233221.157559303663904724.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,
In <2359eed20906031850t48f1dc0au35792e5588ce68a8 at mail.gmail.com>
  "Re: 1.0.9?" on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:50:57 -0500,
  Will Drewry <wad at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oops - I'm a little behind!  I've attached the gem.  If you think it
> looks good, I'll post it and the tarball!  I've already tagged svn for
> 1.0.9.

Thanks!
It works for me.

Please release 1.0.9!
--
kou

From wad at gmail.com  Fri Jun  5 10:41:05 2009
From: wad at gmail.com (Will Drewry)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:41:05 -0500
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] 1.0.9?
In-Reply-To: <20090605.233221.157559303663904724.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <2359eed20906010729y5c1c8036v732bb59acac8bf4f@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090601.234100.949267780715482931.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<2359eed20906031850t48f1dc0au35792e5588ce68a8@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090605.233221.157559303663904724.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <2359eed20906050741k54ce794ct6b5f30e5211e3940@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Kouhei Sutou<kou at cozmixng.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> In <2359eed20906031850t48f1dc0au35792e5588ce68a8 at mail.gmail.com>
> ?"Re: 1.0.9?" on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:50:57 -0500,
> ?Will Drewry <wad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Oops - I'm a little behind! ?I've attached the gem. ?If you think it
>> looks good, I'll post it and the tarball! ?I've already tagged svn for
>> 1.0.9.
>
> Thanks!
> It works for me.
>
> Please release 1.0.9!

Posted on rubyforge with an announcement.

thanks!
will

From evaldo at gardenali.biz  Fri Jun  5 07:32:36 2009
From: evaldo at gardenali.biz (Evaldo Gardenali)
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:32:36 -0300
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] one-to-many parent-children association
Message-ID: <4A290254.5000904@gardenali.biz>

Hi

I need to model something like this: (different class names and 
purposes, but this is easier to understand, instead of a loooooong and 
boring story about objectClasses Foo and Bar)

Base
|
|--Department (objectClass fooDepartment)
|   |-- User1 (objectClass fooUser)
|   |-- User2
|--Department2
   |--User3
   |--User4

I see something inside ActiveLdap::Association::Children, but I do not 
see how to use it, or how the child maps to the parent.

Would someone please advise?

Regards

Evaldo Gardenali


From kou at cozmixng.org  Fri Jun  5 23:54:30 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:54:30 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] [ANN] ActiveLdap 1.0.9
Message-ID: <20090606.125430.1033552815255190571.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

ActiveLdap 1.0.9 had been released!
  http://ruby-activeldap.rubyforge.org/

  % sudo gem install activeldap

== Highlight

Ruby 1.9.1 and Rails 2.3.2 are supported.

== Changes

1.0.2 -> 1.0.9:

  * Added documents in Japanese. [Kazuaki Takase]
  * Supported Ruby 1.9.1.
    * [#20] [Ruby 1.9 Support] :: Running Tests [Alexey.Chebotar]
  * Supported Rails 2.3.2.
    * [#18] [Rails 2.3 Support] :: Running WEBrick Hangs [Alexey.Chebotar]
  * Bug fixes:
    * Fixed blank values detection. [David Morton]
    * [#22] Ruby 1.8.6 p287 :: Undefined methods [Alexey.Chebotar]
    * Fixed gem loading. [Tiago Fernandes]
    * Fixed DN change via #base=. [David Morton]
    * Fixed infinite retry on timeout.
    * Fixed needless reconnection.
  * API improvements:
    * Removed needless instance methods: #prefix=,
      #dn_attribute=, #sort_by=, #order=, #required_classes=,
      #recommended_classes= and #excluded_classes. [David Morton]
    * Removed obsolete scafoold_al generator.
    * Reduced default :retry_limit.
    * Supported association as parameter. [Joe Francis]
    * Normalized schema attribute name. [Tim Hermans]
    * Suppressed AuthenticationError -> ConnectionError
      conversion on reconnection. [Kazuaki Takase]
    * Added ActiveLdap::Schema#dump.
    * ActiveLdap::Base.establish_connection ->
      ActiveLdap::Base.setup_connection.
    * Supported ActiveLdap::Base.find(:last).
    * Added convenient methods:
      * ActiveLdap::Base.first
      * ActiveLdap::Base.last
      * ActiveLdap::Base.all

== Thanks

Thanks for all contributors:
  * Kazuaki Takase
  * Alexey.Chebotar
  * David Morton
  * Joe Francis

Thanks,
--
kou

From kou at cozmixng.org  Sat Jun  6 00:03:40 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 13:03:40 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] one-to-many parent-children association
In-Reply-To: <4A290254.5000904@gardenali.biz>
References: <4A290254.5000904@gardenali.biz>
Message-ID: <20090606.130340.803059383247740775.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <4A290254.5000904 at gardenali.biz>
  "[activeldap-discuss] one-to-many parent-children association" on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:32:36 -0300,
  Evaldo Gardenali <evaldo at gardenali.biz> wrote:

> I need to model something like this: (different class names
> and purposes, but this is easier to understand, instead of a
> loooooong and boring story about objectClasses Foo and Bar)
> 
> Base
> |
> |--Department (objectClass fooDepartment)
> |   |-- User1 (objectClass fooUser)
> |   |-- User2
> |--Department2
>   |--User3
>   |--User4
> 
> I see something inside ActiveLdap::Association::Children,
> but I do not see how to use it, or how the child maps to the
> parent.

I'm sorry but I can't understand what is your requirement.

This?
  department1 = Department.find("department1")
  department1.users -> [#<User: "User1">, #<User: "User2">]

In the above situation, you can define the following models:

  class Department < ActiveLdap::Base
    ldap_mapping :classes => ["fooDepartment"], ...

    def users
      User.find(:all, :base => dn, :connection => connection)
    end
  end

  class User < ActiveLdap::Base
    ldap_mapping :classes => ["fooUser"], ...
  end


Thanks,
--
kou

From mrsanna1 at gmail.com  Sun Jun  7 05:44:48 2009
From: mrsanna1 at gmail.com (Mauro)
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:44:48 +0200
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] rails 2.3.2 and activeldap.
Message-ID: <ab520d140906070244n391a41dbqd83144c9ec0259e0@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry, but I don't still understand if I've to use activeldap gem or
activeldap plugin.
You said that the plugin just provides ActiveLdap initialization on Rails
application. The gem provides both of ActiveLdap itself and
ActiveLdap initialization on Rails application.
Can you post some examples?
With plugin I can initialize activeldap but also use it, so waht is
the difference between gem and plugin?

From kou at cozmixng.org  Sun Jun  7 06:48:43 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:48:43 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] rails 2.3.2 and activeldap.
In-Reply-To: <ab520d140906070244n391a41dbqd83144c9ec0259e0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ab520d140906070244n391a41dbqd83144c9ec0259e0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090607.194843.29593248145852421.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <ab520d140906070244n391a41dbqd83144c9ec0259e0 at mail.gmail.com>
  "[activeldap-discuss] rails 2.3.2 and activeldap." on Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:44:48 +0200,
  Mauro <mrsanna1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, but I don't still understand if I've to use activeldap gem or
> activeldap plugin.
> You said that the plugin just provides ActiveLdap initialization on Rails
> application. The gem provides both of ActiveLdap itself and
> ActiveLdap initialization on Rails application.
> Can you post some examples?
> With plugin I can initialize activeldap but also use it, so waht is
> the difference between gem and plugin?

Sorry. I've misunderstood.
You're right. Both of gem and plugin includes ActiveLdap
itself and Rails adapter.


Generally, please use the gem. It's stable rather than the
plugin. The plugin is a snapshot of the latest ActiveLdap.

Please use the plugin if the gem has a problem but the
problem has been fixed in trunk.


Now, the latest gem supports Rails 2.3.2. Please use the gem
with Rails 2.3.2.


Sorry for your confusion.


Thanks,
--
kou

From mrsanna1 at gmail.com  Sun Jun  7 07:34:07 2009
From: mrsanna1 at gmail.com (Mauro)
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 13:34:07 +0200
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] rails 2.3.2 and activeldap.
In-Reply-To: <20090607.194843.29593248145852421.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <ab520d140906070244n391a41dbqd83144c9ec0259e0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090607.194843.29593248145852421.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <ab520d140906070434m1ddad686sb45cd94435a49ae0@mail.gmail.com>

2009/6/7 Kouhei Sutou <kou at cozmixng.org>:
> Hi,
>
> In <ab520d140906070244n391a41dbqd83144c9ec0259e0 at mail.gmail.com>
> ?"[activeldap-discuss] rails 2.3.2 and activeldap." on Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:44:48 +0200,
> ?Mauro <mrsanna1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, but I don't still understand if I've to use activeldap gem or
>> activeldap plugin.
>> You said that the plugin just provides ActiveLdap initialization on Rails
>> application. The gem provides both of ActiveLdap itself and
>> ActiveLdap initialization on Rails application.
>> Can you post some examples?
>> With plugin I can initialize activeldap but also use it, so waht is
>> the difference between gem and plugin?
>
> Sorry. I've misunderstood.
> You're right. Both of gem and plugin includes ActiveLdap
> itself and Rails adapter.
>
>
> Generally, please use the gem. It's stable rather than the
> plugin. The plugin is a snapshot of the latest ActiveLdap.
>
> Please use the plugin if the gem has a problem but the
> problem has been fixed in trunk.
>
>
> Now, the latest gem supports Rails 2.3.2. Please use the gem
> with Rails 2.3.2.

Thank you for your answer.
I've installed activeldap gem.
Now I've to include it in my rails application with require
'active_ldap' and require 'net/ldap' in application_controller.rb?

From kou at cozmixng.org  Sun Jun  7 16:53:30 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:53:30 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] rails 2.3.2 and activeldap.
In-Reply-To: <ab520d140906070434m1ddad686sb45cd94435a49ae0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ab520d140906070244n391a41dbqd83144c9ec0259e0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090607.194843.29593248145852421.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<ab520d140906070434m1ddad686sb45cd94435a49ae0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090608.055330.759900912627635917.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <ab520d140906070434m1ddad686sb45cd94435a49ae0 at mail.gmail.com>
  "Re: [activeldap-discuss] rails 2.3.2 and activeldap." on Sun, 7 Jun 2009 13:34:07 +0200,
  Mauro <mrsanna1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've installed activeldap gem.
> Now I've to include it in my rails application with require
> 'active_ldap' and require 'net/ldap' in application_controller.rb?

No. You should use config/environment.rb:

  config.gem "activeldap", :lib => "active_ldap"

If you want to use Net::LDAP as LDAP backend, use
config/ldap.rb:

  development:
    ...
    adapter: net-ldap


Thanks,
--
kou

From mrsanna1 at gmail.com  Mon Jun  8 04:16:04 2009
From: mrsanna1 at gmail.com (Mauro)
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:16:04 +0200
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] rails 2.3.2 and activeldap.
In-Reply-To: <20090608.055330.759900912627635917.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <ab520d140906070244n391a41dbqd83144c9ec0259e0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090607.194843.29593248145852421.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<ab520d140906070434m1ddad686sb45cd94435a49ae0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090608.055330.759900912627635917.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <ab520d140906080116v363b7853x29844eb7abd9fd57@mail.gmail.com>

2009/6/7 Kouhei Sutou <kou at cozmixng.org>:
> Hi,
>
> In <ab520d140906070434m1ddad686sb45cd94435a49ae0 at mail.gmail.com>
> ?"Re: [activeldap-discuss] rails 2.3.2 and activeldap." on Sun, 7 Jun 2009 13:34:07 +0200,
> ?Mauro <mrsanna1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've installed activeldap gem.
>> Now I've to include it in my rails application with require
>> 'active_ldap' and require 'net/ldap' in application_controller.rb?
>
> No. You should use config/environment.rb:
>
> ?config.gem "activeldap", :lib => "active_ldap"
>
> If you want to use Net::LDAP as LDAP backend, use
> config/ldap.rb:
>
> ?development:
> ? ?...
> ? ?adapter: net-ldap

I've done.
I can connect to my LDAP backend without net-ldap, I'm only using
activeldap as a gem.
So there is no need to have net-ldap.

From mrsanna1 at gmail.com  Mon Jun  8 07:03:13 2009
From: mrsanna1 at gmail.com (Mauro)
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:03:13 +0200
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] user_link udefined method.
Message-ID: <ab520d140906080403n2a51ec1cm3a4068551079f5cf@mail.gmail.com>

I've done sudo gem installa activeldap, then config.gem "activeldap",
:lib => "active_ldap" in environment.rb.
Then script/generate scaffold_active_ldap, then script/generate
model_active_ldap user and then script/generate controller user.
In views/user/index.html.erb I've done:
 <% if @users.empty? %>
<p>
  <%= "No user." %>
</p>
<% else %>
<ul>
  <% @users.each do |user| %>
  <li>
    <%= user_link(user, true)  %>
  </li>
  <% end %>
</ul>
<% end %>

Then I run the application but when I connect to
http://localhost:3000/user it says:

undefined method `user_link' for #<ActionView::Base:0x7f98d2bf25a8>

Why user_link is undefined?

From evaldo at gardenali.biz  Tue Jun  9 09:55:51 2009
From: evaldo at gardenali.biz (Evaldo Gardenali)
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:55:51 -0300
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] one-to-many parent-children association
In-Reply-To: <20090606.130340.803059383247740775.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <4A290254.5000904@gardenali.biz>
	<20090606.130340.803059383247740775.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <4A2E69E7.7060108@gardenali.biz>

Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In <4A290254.5000904 at gardenali.biz>
>   "[activeldap-discuss] one-to-many parent-children association" on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:32:36 -0300,
>   Evaldo Gardenali <evaldo at gardenali.biz> wrote:
>   
>> I need to model something like this: (different class names
>> and purposes, but this is easier to understand, instead of a
>> loooooong and boring story about objectClasses Foo and Bar)
>>
>> Base
>> |
>> |--Department (objectClass fooDepartment)
>> |   |-- User1 (objectClass fooUser)
>> |   |-- User2
>> |--Department2
>>   |--User3
>>   |--User4
>>
>> I see something inside ActiveLdap::Association::Children,
>> but I do not see how to use it, or how the child maps to the
>> parent.
>>     
>
> I'm sorry but I can't understand what is your requirement.
>
> This?
>   department1 = Department.find("department1")
>   department1.users -> [#<User: "User1">, #<User: "User2">]
>
> In the above situation, you can define the following models:
>
>   class Department < ActiveLdap::Base
>     ldap_mapping :classes => ["fooDepartment"], ...
>
>     def users
>       User.find(:all, :base => dn, :connection => connection)
>     end
>   end
>
>   class User < ActiveLdap::Base
>     ldap_mapping :classes => ["fooUser"], ...
>   end
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>   

Hi

This is a 'loose'/'hacky'  association method, as it seems. The way 
implemented in association/children.rb is way better structured, I just 
wanted the basics to use it effectively, as I cannot see a proper 
initializing function or parameter to it (has_many, belongs_to, that 
kind of stuff)

This, although a hack, works quite well for showing things, but it 
doesnt work that nicely for nested model creation (a la 
15-minute-blog-video "post.comments.create"). I wanted the proper way :)

Regards

Evaldo


From mrsanna1 at gmail.com  Tue Jun  9 17:16:31 2009
From: mrsanna1 at gmail.com (Mauro)
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:16:31 +0200
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] user_link undefined method.
Message-ID: <ab520d140906091416v43668724y4bdca5e5cf272cc6@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry if I post again but I can't resolve a problem.
I've installed activeldap gem, generate scaffold_active_ldap, generate
model_active_ldap user and generate controller user.
Create a method
def index
@users = User.find(:all)
end

and create a view index.html.erb:

<% if @users.empty? -%>
 <p><%= "No user." %></p>
 <% else -%>
 <ul> <% @users.each do |user| -%>
 <li><%= user_link(user, true) %></li>
<% end -%> </ul>
<% end -%>

when I run localhost:3000/user if I have no user it display "No user."
But if I have one or more users it says undefined method user_link.
Why user_link is an undefined method?

From tashen.hatena at gmail.com  Tue Jun  9 20:47:00 2009
From: tashen.hatena at gmail.com (tashen)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:47:00 +0900
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] one-to-many parent-children association
In-Reply-To: <4A2E69E7.7060108@gardenali.biz>
References: <4A290254.5000904@gardenali.biz>	<20090606.130340.803059383247740775.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<4A2E69E7.7060108@gardenali.biz>
Message-ID: <4A2F0284.3080105@gmail.com>

Hi,

I have no idea that for "proper way".

But it might be make some hint for you, below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
ActiveLdap::Base.setup_connection :host => 'localhost',
                                     :base => 'dc=com'

class Department < ActiveLdap::Base
   ldap_mapping :dn_attribute => 'ou',
                 :prefix => 'dc=example',
                 :classes => 'organizationalUnit',
                 :scope => :one

   def users
     unless @users_class
       attr_name  = dn_attribute
       attr_value = self.send attr_name

       parent_obj = self
       @user_class = Class.new(ActiveLdap::Base) do
                       ldap_mapping :prefix => "#{attr_name}=#{attr_value},dc=example",
                                     :dn_attribute => 'cn',
                                     :classes => 'person'
                       @@parent_obj = parent_obj

                       def parent
                         @@parent_obj
                       end
                     end
     end
     @user_class
   end
end
----------------------------------------------------------------------

you can:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
irb> d = Department.find 'Department'
=> #<Department objectClass:<organizationalUnit>, ...>
irb> u = d.users.find :first
=> #<#<Class:0xb781f530> objectClass:<person, top>,...>
irb> u.parent
=> #<Department objectClass:<organizationalUnit>, ...>
----------------------------------------------------------------------

LDIF used to test:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dn: ou=Department,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: organizationalUnit
ou: Department

dn: ou=Department2,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: organizationalUnit
ou: Department2

dn: cn=hoge,ou=Department,dc=example,dc=com
sn: hoge
cn: hoge
objectClass: person
objectClass: top

dn: cn=fuga,ou=Department2,dc=example,dc=com
sn: fuga
cn: fuga
objectClass: person
objectClass: top
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Evaldo Gardenali wrote:
> Kouhei Sutou wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In <4A290254.5000904 at gardenali.biz>
>>   "[activeldap-discuss] one-to-many parent-children association" on 
>> Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:32:36 -0300,
>>   Evaldo Gardenali <evaldo at gardenali.biz> wrote:
>>  
>>> I need to model something like this: (different class names
>>> and purposes, but this is easier to understand, instead of a
>>> loooooong and boring story about objectClasses Foo and Bar)
>>>
>>> Base
>>> |
>>> |--Department (objectClass fooDepartment)
>>> |   |-- User1 (objectClass fooUser)
>>> |   |-- User2
>>> |--Department2
>>>   |--User3
>>>   |--User4
>>>
>>> I see something inside ActiveLdap::Association::Children,
>>> but I do not see how to use it, or how the child maps to the
>>> parent.
>>>     
>>
>> I'm sorry but I can't understand what is your requirement.
>>
>> This?
>>   department1 = Department.find("department1")
>>   department1.users -> [#<User: "User1">, #<User: "User2">]
>>
>> In the above situation, you can define the following models:
>>
>>   class Department < ActiveLdap::Base
>>     ldap_mapping :classes => ["fooDepartment"], ...
>>
>>     def users
>>       User.find(:all, :base => dn, :connection => connection)
>>     end
>>   end
>>
>>   class User < ActiveLdap::Base
>>     ldap_mapping :classes => ["fooUser"], ...
>>   end
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -- 
>> kou
>>   
> 
> Hi
> 
> This is a 'loose'/'hacky'  association method, as it seems. The way 
> implemented in association/children.rb is way better structured, I just 
> wanted the basics to use it effectively, as I cannot see a proper 
> initializing function or parameter to it (has_many, belongs_to, that 
> kind of stuff)
> 
> This, although a hack, works quite well for showing things, but it 
> doesnt work that nicely for nested model creation (a la 
> 15-minute-blog-video "post.comments.create"). I wanted the proper way :)
> 
> Regards
> 
> Evaldo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-activeldap-discuss mailing list
> ruby-activeldap-discuss at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-activeldap-discuss


-- 
tashen (Kazuaki Takase)
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/tashen

From alexey.chebotar at gmail.com  Wed Jun 10 08:59:33 2009
From: alexey.chebotar at gmail.com (Alexey Chebotar)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:59:33 +0300
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Question about children with different
	objectClass
In-Reply-To: <20090602.002129.29649599483596.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <4A1D5B1A.5000404@gmail.com>	<20090531.235545.338122493853641384.kou@cozmixng.org>	<4A23911C.7040005@gmail.com>
	<20090602.002129.29649599483596.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <4A2FAE35.7080801@gmail.com>

Kouhei Sutou ?????:
>> But soon I will have problem with modify_rdn :(
>> I will have tree:
>> ---
>> ou=test_root
>> |-- ou=test_child1
>> | |-- dc=test_domain1
>> | |-- ou=test_child1_child1
>> |-- ou=test_child2
>> | |-- dc=test_domain2
>> ou=test_root2
>> ---
>> And I will need rename ou=test_child1 to ou=test_child3
>>
>>     
>>>> test_child1.modify_rdn_entry(test_child1.dn,
>>>> "dc=test_child3", true, {})
>>>>         
>> ActiveLdap::LdapError::NotAllowedOnNonleaf: Operation not
>> allowed on non-leaf
>>     
>
> I'll look at this problem later. Sorry.
>   
Sorry, I was wrong, here must be: ou=test_child3, not dc=test_child3

 >> test_child1.modify_rdn_entry(test_child1.dn, "ou=test_child3", true, 
{})
ActiveLdap::LdapError::NotAllowedOnNonleaf: Operation not allowed on 
non-leaf
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap_ext.rb:80:in 
`assert_error_code'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:181:in 
`rescue in execute'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:177:in 
`execute'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:165:in 
`block in modify_rdn'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:234:in 
`block in modify_rdn'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:266:in 
`block in operation'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/timeout.rb:15:in 
`call'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/timeout.rb:15:in 
`alarm'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:312:in 
`with_timeout'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:265:in 
`operation'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:233:in 
`modify_rdn'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:160:in 
`modify_rdn'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/operations.rb:504:in 
`modify_rdn_entry'
from (irb):11
from /usr/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'

But this problem (with modify_rdn_entry) solved by changing DB type from 
bdb to hdb :)
"database hdb" in slapd.conf

?> test_child1 = OrgUnit.find "test_child1"
=> #<OrgUnit objectClass:...>
 >> test_child1.modify_rdn_entry(test_child1.dn, "ou=test_child3", true, 
{})
=> #<LDAP::SSLConn:0x9a396d0>

Thanks to Sergey Yanovitsky for help


Can I, somehow, get children from parent, with different objectClass 
than parent? Or parent from entry with different objectClass?

 >> test_child1 = OrgUnit.find "test_child1"
=> #<OrgUnit objectClass:<organizationalUnit>, must:<objectClass, ou>, 
may:<...>, ..., ou: ["test_child1"], ...>
 >> test_child1.children
=> #<ActiveLdap::Association::Children:0x947fcf8 @owner=#<OrgUnit 
objectClass:<organizationalUnit>, must:<objectClass, ou>, may:<...>, 
..., ou: ["test_child1"], ...>, @options={}, @target=[], @loaded=false>
 >> test_child1.children.reload
=> [#<OrgUnit objectClass:<organizationalUnit>, must:<objectClass, ou>, 
may:<...>, ..., ou: ["test_child1_child1"], ...>]
 >> test_child1.children.target
=> [#<OrgUnit objectClass:<organizationalUnit>, must:<objectClass, ou>, 
may:<...>, ..., ou: ["test_child1_child1"], ....>]

 >> test_domain1 = TestDomain.find "test_domain1"
=> #<TestDomain objectClass:<domain>, must:<dc, objectClass>, may:<...>, 
..., dc: ["test_domain1"], ...>
 >> test_domain1.parent
=> nil


From alexey.chebotar at gmail.com  Wed Jun 10 08:59:33 2009
From: alexey.chebotar at gmail.com (Alexey Chebotar)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:59:33 +0300
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Question about children with different
	objectClass
In-Reply-To: <20090602.002129.29649599483596.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <4A1D5B1A.5000404@gmail.com>	<20090531.235545.338122493853641384.kou@cozmixng.org>	<4A23911C.7040005@gmail.com>
	<20090602.002129.29649599483596.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <4A2FAE35.7080801@gmail.com>

Kouhei Sutou ?????:
>> But soon I will have problem with modify_rdn :(
>> I will have tree:
>> ---
>> ou=test_root
>> |-- ou=test_child1
>> | |-- dc=test_domain1
>> | |-- ou=test_child1_child1
>> |-- ou=test_child2
>> | |-- dc=test_domain2
>> ou=test_root2
>> ---
>> And I will need rename ou=test_child1 to ou=test_child3
>>
>>     
>>>> test_child1.modify_rdn_entry(test_child1.dn,
>>>> "dc=test_child3", true, {})
>>>>         
>> ActiveLdap::LdapError::NotAllowedOnNonleaf: Operation not
>> allowed on non-leaf
>>     
>
> I'll look at this problem later. Sorry.
>   
Sorry, I was wrong, here must be: ou=test_child3, not dc=test_child3

 >> test_child1.modify_rdn_entry(test_child1.dn, "ou=test_child3", true, 
{})
ActiveLdap::LdapError::NotAllowedOnNonleaf: Operation not allowed on 
non-leaf
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap_ext.rb:80:in 
`assert_error_code'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:181:in 
`rescue in execute'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:177:in 
`execute'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:165:in 
`block in modify_rdn'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:234:in 
`block in modify_rdn'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:266:in 
`block in operation'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/timeout.rb:15:in 
`call'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/timeout.rb:15:in 
`alarm'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:312:in 
`with_timeout'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:265:in 
`operation'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:233:in 
`modify_rdn'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/adapter/ldap.rb:160:in 
`modify_rdn'
from 
/var/iVOCS/onm/vendor/plugins/activeldap-trunk/lib/active_ldap/operations.rb:504:in 
`modify_rdn_entry'
from (irb):11
from /usr/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'

But this problem (with modify_rdn_entry) solved by changing DB type from 
bdb to hdb :)
"database hdb" in slapd.conf

?> test_child1 = OrgUnit.find "test_child1"
=> #<OrgUnit objectClass:...>
 >> test_child1.modify_rdn_entry(test_child1.dn, "ou=test_child3", true, 
{})
=> #<LDAP::SSLConn:0x9a396d0>

Thanks to Sergey Yanovitsky for help


Can I, somehow, get children from parent, with different objectClass 
than parent? Or parent from entry with different objectClass?

 >> test_child1 = OrgUnit.find "test_child1"
=> #<OrgUnit objectClass:<organizationalUnit>, must:<objectClass, ou>, 
may:<...>, ..., ou: ["test_child1"], ...>
 >> test_child1.children
=> #<ActiveLdap::Association::Children:0x947fcf8 @owner=#<OrgUnit 
objectClass:<organizationalUnit>, must:<objectClass, ou>, may:<...>, 
..., ou: ["test_child1"], ...>, @options={}, @target=[], @loaded=false>
 >> test_child1.children.reload
=> [#<OrgUnit objectClass:<organizationalUnit>, must:<objectClass, ou>, 
may:<...>, ..., ou: ["test_child1_child1"], ...>]
 >> test_child1.children.target
=> [#<OrgUnit objectClass:<organizationalUnit>, must:<objectClass, ou>, 
may:<...>, ..., ou: ["test_child1_child1"], ....>]

 >> test_domain1 = TestDomain.find "test_domain1"
=> #<TestDomain objectClass:<domain>, must:<dc, objectClass>, may:<...>, 
..., dc: ["test_domain1"], ...>
 >> test_domain1.parent
=> nil


From kou at cozmixng.org  Wed Jun 10 07:17:24 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:17:24 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] user_link udefined method.
In-Reply-To: <ab520d140906080403n2a51ec1cm3a4068551079f5cf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ab520d140906080403n2a51ec1cm3a4068551079f5cf@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090610.201724.655406241861191205.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <ab520d140906080403n2a51ec1cm3a4068551079f5cf at mail.gmail.com>
  "[activeldap-discuss] user_link udefined method." on Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:03:13 +0200,
  Mauro <mrsanna1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've done sudo gem installa activeldap, then config.gem "activeldap",
> :lib => "active_ldap" in environment.rb.
> Then script/generate scaffold_active_ldap, then script/generate
> model_active_ldap user and then script/generate controller user.
> In views/user/index.html.erb I've done:
>  <% if @users.empty? %>
> <p>
>   <%= "No user." %>
> </p>
> <% else %>
> <ul>
>   <% @users.each do |user| %>
>   <li>
>     <%= user_link(user, true)  %>
>   </li>
>   <% end %>
> </ul>
> <% end %>
> 
> Then I run the application but when I connect to
> http://localhost:3000/user it says:
> 
> undefined method `user_link' for #<ActionView::Base:0x7f98d2bf25a8>
> 
> Why user_link is undefined?

What is 'user_link'?

What about this?
  link_to("label", user)


Thanks,
--
kou

From kou at cozmixng.org  Wed Jun 10 07:23:21 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:23:21 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Ruby/LDAP 0.9.9?
Message-ID: <20090610.202321.1089447038122133112.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

Is there a plan to Ruby/LDAP 0.9.9?

My friend wants to use Ruby/LDAP with OpenLDAP 2.4. But
Ruby/LDAP 0.9.8 can't build with OpenLDAP 2.4.


P.S. Is there a plan to release gem on rubyforge.net? If
Ruby/LDAP gem is released on rubyforge.net, we can install
Ruby/LDAP easily with 'sudo gem install ruby-ldap'. :)


Thanks,
--
kou

From mrsanna1 at gmail.com  Wed Jun 10 15:25:01 2009
From: mrsanna1 at gmail.com (Mauro)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:25:01 +0200
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] user_link udefined method.
In-Reply-To: <20090610.201724.655406241861191205.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <ab520d140906080403n2a51ec1cm3a4068551079f5cf@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090610.201724.655406241861191205.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <ab520d140906101225x7e1ae468v3e393f8a7a54e22b@mail.gmail.com>

2009/6/10 Kouhei Sutou <kou at cozmixng.org>:
> Hi,
>
> In <ab520d140906080403n2a51ec1cm3a4068551079f5cf at mail.gmail.com>
> ?"[activeldap-discuss] user_link udefined method." on Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:03:13 +0200,
> ?Mauro <mrsanna1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've done sudo gem installa activeldap, then config.gem "activeldap",
>> :lib => "active_ldap" in environment.rb.
>> Then script/generate scaffold_active_ldap, then script/generate
>> model_active_ldap user and then script/generate controller user.
>> In views/user/index.html.erb I've done:
>> ?<% if @users.empty? %>
>> <p>
>> ? <%= "No user." %>
>> </p>
>> <% else %>
>> <ul>
>> ? <% @users.each do |user| %>
>> ? <li>
>> ? ? <%= user_link(user, true) ?%>
>> ? </li>
>> ? <% end %>
>> </ul>
>> <% end %>
>>
>> Then I run the application but when I connect to
>> http://localhost:3000/user it says:
>>
>> undefined method `user_link' for #<ActionView::Base:0x7f98d2bf25a8>
>>
>> Why user_link is undefined?
>
> What is 'user_link'?
>
> What about this?
> ?link_to("label", user)

I''ve installed activeldap gem.
Under gems/activeldap/example/al-admin/app/views/users there is index.html.erb.
In this file there is:

<% if @users.empty? -%>
<p><%= _("No user.") %></p>
<% else -%>
<h2><%=h LdapUser.base %></h2>
<ul>
<%   @users.each do |user| -%>
  <li><%= user_link(user, true) %></li>
<%   end -%>
</ul>
<% end -%>

So the method is user_link.
Is it an error of the example?

From MR-Mencel at wiu.edu  Thu Jun 11 01:26:02 2009
From: MR-Mencel at wiu.edu (Matt Mencel)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:26:02 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Closing the ActiveLdap Connection
In-Reply-To: <ab520d140906101225x7e1ae468v3e393f8a7a54e22b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1506525150.1544471244697962017.JavaMail.root@zcs10>

Used to be that ActiveLdap::Base.close worked....didn't it?  That method doesn't work anymore (I'm running 1.0.9)....so how do you close the existing ActiveLdap connection?  Here is my sample code....and I've commented out the close for now.

class User < ActiveLdap::Base
  ldap_mapping :dn_attribute => "uid",
               :prefix => "ou=people"
               
  def empty?()
    self.have_attribute?("dn")
  end
  
  def self.authenticate(username, password)
    return false if username.empty? or password.empty?
    
      begin
        ActiveLdap::Base.setup_connection(
          :host => "ldap.wiu.edu",
          :port => 389,
          :base => "dc=wiu,dc=edu",
          :bind_dn => "uid=#{username},ou=People,dc=wiu,dc=edu",
          :password_block => Proc.new { password },
          :allow_anonymous => false
        )
        #ActiveLdap::Base.close
        return true
      rescue ActiveLdap::AuthenticationError
        return false
      end
    end
    
end

Thanks,
Matt

From alexey.chebotar at gmail.com  Thu Jun 11 04:23:07 2009
From: alexey.chebotar at gmail.com (Alexey Chebotar)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:23:07 +0300
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Ruby/LDAP 0.9.9?
In-Reply-To: <20090610.202321.1089447038122133112.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <20090610.202321.1089447038122133112.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <458a4ba50906110123j557b8c14u73512a357cf004e7@mail.gmail.com>

Hi kou.


I has attached gem, he includes ruby-ldap version 0.9.9.
Can you please test this gem with your friend on OpenLDAP 2.4.15 or higher?
:)

I will announce about ruby-ldap 0.9.9 if gem will work

Is there a plan to Ruby/LDAP 0.9.9?
>

> My friend wants to use Ruby/LDAP with OpenLDAP 2.4. But
> Ruby/LDAP 0.9.8 can't build with OpenLDAP 2.4.
>

> P.S. Is there a plan to release gem on rubyforge.net? If
> Ruby/LDAP gem is released on rubyforge.net, we can install
> Ruby/LDAP easily with 'sudo gem install ruby-ldap'. :)
>

Just do 'sudo gem install ruby-ldap-0.9.9.gem' ;-)

P.S.: Gem works for me :) And I has registered project on Rubyforge
http://rubyforge.org/projects/ruby-ldap/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ruby-activeldap-discuss/attachments/20090611/59dec0aa/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ruby-ldap-0.9.9.gem
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 54272 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ruby-activeldap-discuss/attachments/20090611/59dec0aa/attachment.obj>

From kou at cozmixng.org  Thu Jun 11 08:52:36 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:52:36 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Ruby/LDAP 0.9.9?
In-Reply-To: <458a4ba50906110123j557b8c14u73512a357cf004e7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090610.202321.1089447038122133112.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<458a4ba50906110123j557b8c14u73512a357cf004e7@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090611.215236.934659361650074140.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <458a4ba50906110123j557b8c14u73512a357cf004e7 at mail.gmail.com>
  "Re: [activeldap-discuss] Ruby/LDAP 0.9.9?" on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:23:07 +0300,
  Alexey Chebotar <alexey.chebotar at gmail.com> wrote:

> I has attached gem, he includes ruby-ldap version 0.9.9.

Great!

> Can you please test this gem with your friend on OpenLDAP 2.4.15 or higher? :)

It works with OpenLDAP 2.4.15 on my environment.
But I find a bug that LDAP::VERSION is still 0.9.7. ;-)

> I will announce about ruby-ldap 0.9.9 if gem will work

Could you also release .tar.gz? My friend doesn't use gem...

> P.S.: Gem works for me :) And I has registered project on Rubyforge http://
> rubyforge.org/projects/ruby-ldap/

It's good news. :)


P.S.: My friend said 'Thanks Alexey for releasing 0.9.9!'. :)


Thanks,
--
kou

From kou at cozmixng.org  Thu Jun 11 08:54:44 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:54:44 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] user_link udefined method.
In-Reply-To: <ab520d140906101225x7e1ae468v3e393f8a7a54e22b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ab520d140906080403n2a51ec1cm3a4068551079f5cf@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090610.201724.655406241861191205.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<ab520d140906101225x7e1ae468v3e393f8a7a54e22b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090611.215444.1042906170178798084.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <ab520d140906101225x7e1ae468v3e393f8a7a54e22b at mail.gmail.com>
  "Re: [activeldap-discuss] user_link udefined method." on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:25:01 +0200,
  Mauro <mrsanna1 at gmail.com> wrote:

>>> I've done sudo gem installa activeldap, then config.gem "activeldap",
>>> :lib => "active_ldap" in environment.rb.
>>> Then script/generate scaffold_active_ldap, then script/generate
>>> model_active_ldap user and then script/generate controller user.
>>> In views/user/index.html.erb I've done:
>>> ?<% if @users.empty? %>
>>> <p>
>>> ? <%= "No user." %>
>>> </p>
>>> <% else %>
>>> <ul>
>>> ? <% @users.each do |user| %>
>>> ? <li>
>>> ? ? <%= user_link(user, true) ?%>
>>> ? </li>
>>> ? <% end %>
>>> </ul>
>>> <% end %>
>>>
>>> Then I run the application but when I connect to
>>> http://localhost:3000/user it says:
>>>
>>> undefined method `user_link' for #<ActionView::Base:0x7f98d2bf25a8>
>>>
>>> Why user_link is undefined?
>>
>> What is 'user_link'?
>>
>> What about this?
>> ?link_to("label", user)
> 
> I''ve installed activeldap gem.
> Under gems/activeldap/example/al-admin/app/views/users there is index.html.erb.
> In this file there is:
> 
> <% if @users.empty? -%>
> <p><%= _("No user.") %></p>
> <% else -%>
> <h2><%=h LdapUser.base %></h2>
> <ul>
> <%   @users.each do |user| -%>
>   <li><%= user_link(user, true) %></li>
> <%   end -%>
> </ul>
> <% end -%>
> 
> So the method is user_link.
> Is it an error of the example?

Ah, I see.
user_link is defined in the example. See
app/helpers/users_helper.rb.


Thanks,
--
kou

From kou at cozmixng.org  Thu Jun 11 09:04:40 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:04:40 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Closing the ActiveLdap Connection
In-Reply-To: <1506525150.1544471244697962017.JavaMail.root@zcs10>
References: <ab520d140906101225x7e1ae468v3e393f8a7a54e22b@mail.gmail.com>
	<1506525150.1544471244697962017.JavaMail.root@zcs10>
Message-ID: <20090611.220440.418046536507914508.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <1506525150.1544471244697962017.JavaMail.root at zcs10>
  "[activeldap-discuss] Closing the ActiveLdap Connection" on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:26:02 -0500 (CDT),
  Matt Mencel <MR-Mencel at wiu.edu> wrote:

> Used to be that ActiveLdap::Base.close worked....didn't it?  That method doesn't work anymore (I'm running 1.0.9)....so how do you close the existing ActiveLdap connection?  Here is my sample code....and I've commented out the close for now.

It's ActiveLdap::Base.connection.disconnect!

But you should use ActiveLdap::Base#bind and
ActiveLdap::Base#remove_connection.

> class User < ActiveLdap::Base
>   ldap_mapping :dn_attribute => "uid",
>                :prefix => "ou=people"
>                
>   def empty?()
>     self.have_attribute?("dn")
>   end
>   
>   def self.authenticate(username, password)
>     return false if username.empty? or password.empty?
      find(username).authenticated?(password)
    end

    def authenticated?(password)
      bind(password)
      remove_connection
      true
    rescue ActiveLdap::AuthenticationError,
             ActiveLdap::LdapError::UnwillingToPerform
      false
    end
> end

See also: http://code.google.com/p/ruby-activeldap/source/browse/trunk/examples/al-admin/app/models/ldap_user.rb


Thanks,
--
kou

From MR-Mencel at wiu.edu  Thu Jun 11 12:02:24 2009
From: MR-Mencel at wiu.edu (Matt Mencel)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:02:24 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Closing the ActiveLdap Connection
In-Reply-To: <346354318.1612661244736050932.JavaMail.root@zcs10>
Message-ID: <1262230884.1613161244736144513.JavaMail.root@zcs10>

Awesome!  That is much cleaner.  Thanks!

I've documented the work I've done the last couple days to get LDAP browsing and authentication working in a sample Rails app.  A bunch of the info I found already out there was getting pretty dated.  Anyway, it's up on my blog page if you or anyone else is interested in critiquing it.  :)

http://www.techminer.net/blog/?p=60

Thanks,
Matt

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kouhei Sutou" <kou at cozmixng.org>
To: ruby-activeldap-discuss at rubyforge.org
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:04:40 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [activeldap-discuss] Closing the ActiveLdap Connection

Hi,

In <1506525150.1544471244697962017.JavaMail.root at zcs10>
  "[activeldap-discuss] Closing the ActiveLdap Connection" on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:26:02 -0500 (CDT),
  Matt Mencel <MR-Mencel at wiu.edu> wrote:

> Used to be that ActiveLdap::Base.close worked....didn't it?  That method doesn't work anymore (I'm running 1.0.9)....so how do you close the existing ActiveLdap connection?  Here is my sample code....and I've commented out the close for now.

It's ActiveLdap::Base.connection.disconnect!

But you should use ActiveLdap::Base#bind and
ActiveLdap::Base#remove_connection.

> class User < ActiveLdap::Base
>   ldap_mapping :dn_attribute => "uid",
>                :prefix => "ou=people"
>                
>   def empty?()
>     self.have_attribute?("dn")
>   end
>   
>   def self.authenticate(username, password)
>     return false if username.empty? or password.empty?
      find(username).authenticated?(password)
    end

    def authenticated?(password)
      bind(password)
      remove_connection
      true
    rescue ActiveLdap::AuthenticationError,
             ActiveLdap::LdapError::UnwillingToPerform
      false
    end
> end

See also: http://code.google.com/p/ruby-activeldap/source/browse/trunk/examples/al-admin/app/models/ldap_user.rb


Thanks,
--
kou
_______________________________________________
ruby-activeldap-discuss mailing list
ruby-activeldap-discuss at rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-activeldap-discuss

From alexey.chebotar at gmail.com  Thu Jun 11 12:05:08 2009
From: alexey.chebotar at gmail.com (Alexey Chebotar)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:05:08 +0300
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] [ANN] Ruby/LDAP 0.9.9
Message-ID: <458a4ba50906110905p38e35fa4mb585fb93d73f0874@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Ruby/LDAP 0.9.9 had been released!

I think, Rubyforge is better than Sourceforge for storing Ruby extensions,
because of this, I want say to all:

>From this moment primary site of project is Rubyforge
* http://ruby-ldap.rubyforge.org/ (Will be updated soon)
* http://rubyforge.org/projects/ruby-ldap/
* Mirror for Download:
 ruby-activeldap project on Googlecode -
http://code.google.com/p/ruby-activeldap/downloads/list

With this release (and in future), you can use ruby-ldap as an ruby gem:
 % sudo gem install ruby-ldap

Also, added support of OpenLDAP 2.4.15 and higher.

== Changes

0.9.8 -> 0.9.9:
  * Fixed LDAP::VERSION. Thanks to Kouhei Sutou
  * Gem Packaging Support. Thanks to S. Potter [mbbx6spp]
  * LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL changed to LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN
    (more information in ITS#5655). Thanks to Milos Jakubicek
  * Fixed regular expression in LDAP::Schema.attr()

P.S.: I will investigate all reports in Sourceforge project page
P.S.S.: Kou, please let me know if you want remove files from your project
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ruby-activeldap-discuss/attachments/20090611/a0c4667b/attachment.html>

From kou at cozmixng.org  Mon Jun 22 11:02:36 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:02:36 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Question about children with different
 objectClass
In-Reply-To: <4A2FAE35.7080801@gmail.com>
References: <4A23911C.7040005@gmail.com>
	<20090602.002129.29649599483596.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<4A2FAE35.7080801@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090623.000236.840493247503766685.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <4A2FAE35.7080801 at gmail.com>
  "Re: [activeldap-discuss] Question about children with different objectClass" on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:59:33 +0300,
  Alexey Chebotar <alexey.chebotar at gmail.com> wrote:

> >> ---
> >> ou=test_root
> >> |-- ou=test_child1
> >> | |-- dc=test_domain1
> >> | |-- ou=test_child1_child1
> >> |-- ou=test_child2
> >> | |-- dc=test_domain2
> >> ou=test_root2
> >> ---

> Can I, somehow, get children from parent, with different
> objectClass than parent? Or parent from entry with different
> objectClass?
> 
>>> test_child1 = OrgUnit.find "test_child1"
> => #<OrgUnit objectClass:<organizationalUnit>,
> must:<objectClass, ou>, may:<...>, ..., ou: ["test_child1"],
> ...>
>>> test_child1.children
> => #<ActiveLdap::Association::Children:0x947fcf8
> @owner=#<OrgUnit objectClass:<organizationalUnit>,
> must:<objectClass, ou>, may:<...>, ..., ou: ["test_child1"],
> ...>, @options={}, @target=[], @loaded=false>
>>> test_child1.children.reload
> => [#<OrgUnit objectClass:<organizationalUnit>,
> must:<objectClass, ou>, may:<...>, ..., ou:
> ["test_child1_child1"], ...>]
>>> test_child1.children.target
> => [#<OrgUnit objectClass:<organizationalUnit>,
> must:<objectClass, ou>, may:<...>, ..., ou:
> ["test_child1_child1"], ....>]
> 
>>> test_domain1 = TestDomain.find "test_domain1"
> => #<TestDomain objectClass:<domain>, must:<dc,
> objectClass>, may:<...>, ..., dc: ["test_domain1"], ...>
>>> test_domain1.parent
> => nil

What about using generic class?

class Entry < ActiveLdap::Base
  ldap_mapping :prefix => "",
               :classes => ["top"],
               :scope => :sub
  self.dn_attribute = nil
end

  test_child1 = Entry.find(:all, "ou=test_child1")
  test_child1.children # => dc=test_domain1, ou=test_child1_child1
  test_child1.children[0].parent # => dc=test_child1

Thanks,
--
kou

From kou at cozmixng.org  Tue Jun 23 09:32:29 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:32:29 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] [RFC] better names for has_many and
	belongs_to(:many)
Message-ID: <20090623.223229.4959786962498738.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

I want to hear your comments about better names for has_many
and belongs_to(:many).


ActiveLdap has 4 associations: has_many, has_many(:wrap),
belongs_to and belongs_to(:many). They has :primary_key
and/or :foreign_key options. We are a little confused about
them. See the below matrix. (Thanks to tashen!)


                      Primary Key     Reference Key   Return Value
                      ----------      -----------     ---------
    belongs_to        Other's         My              singular
                      :primary_key    :foreign_key

    belongs_to(:many) My              Other's         plural
                      :foreign_key    :many

    has_many          My              Other's         plural
                      :foreign_key    :primary_key

    has_many(:wrap)   Other's         My              plural
                      :primary_key    :wrap

class Group < ActiveLdap::Base
  ldap_mapping :dn_attribute => "cn",
               :classes => ['posixGroup']

  # has_many(:wrap)
  has_many :members, :class_name => "User",
           :wrap => "memberUid",  # Group#memberUid
           :primary_key => "uid", # User#uid

  # has_many
  has_many :primary_members, :class_name => 'User',
           :foreign_key => 'gidNumber', # Group#gidNumber
           :primary_key => 'gidNumber'  # User#gidNumber
end

class User < ActiveLdap::Base
  ldap_mapping :dn_attribute => 'uid', :prefix => 'ou=People',
               :classes => ['person', 'posixAccount']

  # belongs_to
  belongs_to :primary_group, :class_name => "Group",
             :foreign_key => "gidNumber", # User#gidNumber
             :primary_key => "gidNumber"  # Group#gidNumber

  # belongs_to(:many)
  belongs_to :groups,
             :many => 'memberUid', # Group#memberUid
             :foreign_key => 'uid  # User#uid
end


tashen suggests me that we should change the current
behavior like the following matrix:

'*' shows items that we should change.

                         Primary Key     Reference Key   Return Value
                         -----------     -------------   ------------
    belongs_to           Other's         My              singular
                         :primary_key    :foreign_key

    * belongs_to(:many)  My              Other's         plural
                         * :primary_key  :many

    * has_many           My              Other's         plural
                         * :primary_key  * :foreign_key

    has_many(:wrap)      Other's         My              plural
                         :primary_key    :wrap

I want to accept tashen's suggestion but we should not break
API backward compatibility. So I want to use new names for
has_many and belongs_to(:many) and keep the current APIs
with warning messages.

But I don't have a good idea for it. Could you tell me
more better names for belongs_to(:many) and has_many that
represents their behavior?


# tashen, please follow up if I miss information.


Thanks,
--
kou

From tashen.hatena at gmail.com  Tue Jun 23 13:41:36 2009
From: tashen.hatena at gmail.com (tashen)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:41:36 +0900
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] [RFC] better names for has_many and
	belongs_to(:many)
In-Reply-To: <20090623.223229.4959786962498738.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <20090623.223229.4959786962498738.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <4A4113D0.6000508@gmail.com>

Hi,

kou:
 > # tashen, please follow up if I miss information.

I think that was mentioned enough.

All:

Please comment for solving this.

Regards.

Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I want to hear your comments about better names for has_many
> and belongs_to(:many).
> 
> 
> ActiveLdap has 4 associations: has_many, has_many(:wrap),
> belongs_to and belongs_to(:many). They has :primary_key
> and/or :foreign_key options. We are a little confused about
> them. See the below matrix. (Thanks to tashen!)
> 
> 
>                       Primary Key     Reference Key   Return Value
>                       ----------      -----------     ---------
>     belongs_to        Other's         My              singular
>                       :primary_key    :foreign_key
> 
>     belongs_to(:many) My              Other's         plural
>                       :foreign_key    :many
> 
>     has_many          My              Other's         plural
>                       :foreign_key    :primary_key
> 
>     has_many(:wrap)   Other's         My              plural
>                       :primary_key    :wrap
> 
> class Group < ActiveLdap::Base
>   ldap_mapping :dn_attribute => "cn",
>                :classes => ['posixGroup']
> 
>   # has_many(:wrap)
>   has_many :members, :class_name => "User",
>            :wrap => "memberUid",  # Group#memberUid
>            :primary_key => "uid", # User#uid
> 
>   # has_many
>   has_many :primary_members, :class_name => 'User',
>            :foreign_key => 'gidNumber', # Group#gidNumber
>            :primary_key => 'gidNumber'  # User#gidNumber
> end
> 
> class User < ActiveLdap::Base
>   ldap_mapping :dn_attribute => 'uid', :prefix => 'ou=People',
>                :classes => ['person', 'posixAccount']
> 
>   # belongs_to
>   belongs_to :primary_group, :class_name => "Group",
>              :foreign_key => "gidNumber", # User#gidNumber
>              :primary_key => "gidNumber"  # Group#gidNumber
> 
>   # belongs_to(:many)
>   belongs_to :groups,
>              :many => 'memberUid', # Group#memberUid
>              :foreign_key => 'uid  # User#uid
> end
> 
> 
> tashen suggests me that we should change the current
> behavior like the following matrix:
> 
> '*' shows items that we should change.
> 
>                          Primary Key     Reference Key   Return Value
>                          -----------     -------------   ------------
>     belongs_to           Other's         My              singular
>                          :primary_key    :foreign_key
> 
>     * belongs_to(:many)  My              Other's         plural
>                          * :primary_key  :many
> 
>     * has_many           My              Other's         plural
>                          * :primary_key  * :foreign_key
> 
>     has_many(:wrap)      Other's         My              plural
>                          :primary_key    :wrap
> 
> I want to accept tashen's suggestion but we should not break
> API backward compatibility. So I want to use new names for
> has_many and belongs_to(:many) and keep the current APIs
> with warning messages.
> 
> But I don't have a good idea for it. Could you tell me
> more better names for belongs_to(:many) and has_many that
> represents their behavior?
> 
> 
> # tashen, please follow up if I miss information.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-activeldap-discuss mailing list
> ruby-activeldap-discuss at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-activeldap-discuss


-- 
tashen (Kazuaki Takase)
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/tashen

From MR-Mencel at wiu.edu  Wed Jun 24 18:23:47 2009
From: MR-Mencel at wiu.edu (Matt Mencel)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:23:47 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Adding LDAP User to the Apps User model
In-Reply-To: <1802594913.3360391245881895290.JavaMail.root@zcs10>
Message-ID: <2067542649.3360801245882227217.JavaMail.root@zcs10>

In my rails app I am adding users automatically to my User model when they login and authenticate against LDAP.  I just want to see if anyone thinks there is a better way to do it.

Thanks,
Matt




#app/controllers/login_controller.rb
class LoginController < ApplicationController
  def login
      if session[:person] = LdapUser.authenticate(params[:login][:name], params[:login][:password])
        session[:username] = params[:login][:name]
        if !User.exists?(:uid => params[:login][:name])
          ldapuser = LdapUser.find(params[:login][:name])
          u = User.create(:uid => ldapuser.uid, :mail => ldapuser.mail, :wiuid => ldapuser.wiuid)
        end
      end
  end
end




#app/models/ldap_user.rb
class LdapUser < ActiveLdap::Base
  ldap_mapping :dn_attribute => "uid",
               :prefix => "ou=people"
               
  def empty?()
    self.have_attribute?("dn")
  end
  
  def self.authenticate(username, password)
    return false if username.empty? or password.empty?
    find(username).authenticated?(password)
  end
    
  def authenticated?(password)
    bind(password)
    remove_connection
    true
  rescue ActiveLdap::AuthenticationError, ActiveLdap::LdapError::UnwillingToPerform
    false
  end
    
end

From tommyblue at lilik.it  Tue Jun 30 07:47:32 2009
From: tommyblue at lilik.it (TommyBlue)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:47:32 +0200
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Spaces problem
Message-ID: <4A49FB54.6020803@lilik.it>

Hi everybody,
i'm facing problems with spaces in searches. My class uses cn as dn 
attribute:

class Account < ActiveLdap::Base
	ldap_mapping 	:dn_attribute => 'cn',
                 :prefix => 'ou=users',
                 :classes => ['top', 'InetOrgPerson', 'posixAccount', 
'shadowAccount'],
                 :scope => :one
end

With a simple search like this:

Account.find(:all, "a b")

i get this error:

Net::LDAP::LdapError: invalid filter syntax
	from 
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ruby-net-ldap-0.0.4/lib/net/ldap/filter.rb:302:in 
`initialize'
	from 
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ruby-net-ldap-0.0.4/lib/net/ldap/filter.rb:283:in 
`new'
	from 
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ruby-net-ldap-0.0.4/lib/net/ldap/filter.rb:283:in 
`construct'
	from 
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ruby-net-ldap-0.0.4/lib/net/ldap.rb:1128:in 
`search'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/net_ldap.rb:135:in 
`send'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/net_ldap.rb:135:in 
`execute'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:646:in 
`log'
	from 
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.3.2/lib/active_support/core_ext/benchmark.rb:10:in 
`realtime'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:646:in 
`log'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/net_ldap.rb:135:in 
`execute'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/net_ldap.rb:78:in 
`search'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:165:in 
`search'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:266:in 
`operation'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/timeout.rb:15:in 
`call'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/timeout.rb:15:in 
`alarm'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:312:in 
`with_timeout'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:265:in 
`operation'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/base.rb:164:in 
`search'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/adapter/net_ldap.rb:66:in 
`search'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/operations.rb:65:in 
`search'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/operations.rb:269:in 
`find_every'
	from 
/home/tommyblue/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activeldap-1.0.9/lib/active_ldap/operations.rb:213:in 
`find'


This is the extract from development.log:

LDAP: search: FAILED (0.0ms): {:attributes=>[], :scope=>:sub, 
:filter=>"(&(cn=a 
b)(&(objectClass=top)(objectClass=InetOrgPerson)(objectClass=posixAccount)(objectClass=shadowAccount)))", 
:base=>"ou=utenti,dc=lilik,dc=it", :error=>"Net::LDAP::LdapError", 
:error_message=>"invalid filter syntax"}


I've tried to escape the space with "a\sb" and "a\ b" but i get the same 
error.
Without space (eg. Account.find(:all, "ab") ) everything works well.

The same error appears when i create a new object which cn contains a space.

Thanks in advance,
Tommaso

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3622 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ruby-activeldap-discuss/attachments/20090630/22045a7a/attachment.bin>

From alexey.chebotar at gmail.com  Tue Jun 30 10:26:18 2009
From: alexey.chebotar at gmail.com (Alexey Chebotar)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:26:18 +0300
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Spaces problem
In-Reply-To: <4A49FB54.6020803@lilik.it>
References: <4A49FB54.6020803@lilik.it>
Message-ID: <4A4A208A.60806@gmail.com>

Hi TommyBlue.
I think it is problem of Net::LDAP library. I can't reproduce this 
problem with library Ruby/LDAP

I has created new Account from console, and then tried find them:

 >> Account.find(:all, "a b")
=> [#<Account objectClass:<top, inetOrgPerson, posixAccount, 
shadowAccount>, must:<cn, gidNumber, homeDirectory, objectClass, sn, 
uid, uidNumber>, may:<audio, businessCategory, carLicense, 
departmentNumber, description, destinationIndicator, displayName, 
employeeNumber, employeeType, facsimileTelephoneNumber, gecos, 
givenName, homePhone, homePostalAddress, initials, 
internationaliSDNNumber, jpegPhoto, l, labeledURI, loginShell, mail, 
manager, mobile, o, ou, pager, photo, physicalDeliveryOfficeName, 
postOfficeBox, postalAddress, postalCode, preferredDeliveryMethod, 
preferredLanguage, registeredAddress, roomNumber, secretary, seeAlso, 
shadowExpire, shadowFlag, shadowInactive, shadowLastChange, shadowMax, 
shadowMin, shadowWarning, st, street, telephoneNumber, 
teletexTerminalIdentifier, telexNumber, title, uid, userCertificate, 
userPKCS12, userPassword, userSMIMECertificate, x121Address, 
x500UniqueIdentifier>, audio: [], businessCategory: [], carLicense: [], 
cn: ["a b"], commonName: ["a b"], departmentNumber: [], description: [], 
destinationIndicator: [], displayName: [], employeeNumber: [], 
employeeType: [], facsimileTelephoneNumber: [], fax: [], gecos: [], 
gidNumber: [10000], givenName: [], gn: [], homeDirectory: ["/home/ab"], 
homePhone: [], homePostalAddress: [], homeTelephoneNumber: [], initials: 
[], internationaliSDNNumber: [], jpegPhoto: [], l: [], labeledURI: [], 
localityName: [], loginShell: [], mail: [], manager: [], mobile: [], 
mobileTelephoneNumber: [], o: [], objectClass: ["top", "inetOrgPerson", 
"posixAccount", "shadowAccount"], organizationName: [], 
organizationalUnitName: [], ou: [], pager: [], pagerTelephoneNumber: [], 
photo: [], physicalDeliveryOfficeName: [], postOfficeBox: [], 
postalAddress: [], postalCode: [], preferredDeliveryMethod: [], 
preferredLanguage: [], registeredAddress: [], rfc822Mailbox: [], 
roomNumber: [], secretary: [], seeAlso: [], shadowExpire: [], 
shadowFlag: [], shadowInactive: [], shadowLastChange: [], shadowMax: [], 
shadowMin: [], shadowWarning: [], sn: ["A B"], st: [], 
stateOrProvinceName: [], street: [], streetAddress: [], surname: ["A 
B"], telephoneNumber: [], teletexTerminalIdentifier: [], telexNumber: 
[], title: [], uid: ["ab"], uidNumber: [10000], userCertificate: [], 
userPKCS12: [], userPassword: [], userSMIMECertificate: [], userid: 
["ab"], x121Address: [], x500UniqueIdentifier: []>]

Cut from log file:

  LDAP: add (92.0ms): {:dn=>"cn=a b,ou=domains,dc=...,dc=com", 
:attributes=>[[:add, "cn", {"cn"=>["a b"]}], [:add, "objectClass", 
{"objectClass"=>["top", "InetOrgPerson", "posixAccount", 
"shadowAccount"]}], [:add, "uid", {"uid"=>["ab"]}], [:add, "uidNumber", 
{"uidNumber"=>["10000"]}], [:add, "sn", {"sn"=>["A B"]}], [:add, 
"gidNumber", {"gidNumber"=>["10000"]}], [:add, "homeDirectory", 
{"homeDirectory"=>["/home/ab"]}]]}
  LDAP: search (3.9ms): {:base=>"ou=domains,dc=...,dc=com", 
:scope=>:one, :filter=>"(&(cn=a 
b)(&(objectClass=top)(objectClass=InetOrgPerson)(objectClass=posixAccount)(objectClass=shadowAccount)))", 
:attributes=>[]}

> i'm facing problems with spaces in searches. My class uses cn as dn 
> attribute:
>
> class Account < ActiveLdap::Base
>     ldap_mapping     :dn_attribute => 'cn',
>                 :prefix => 'ou=users',
>                 :classes => ['top', 'InetOrgPerson', 'posixAccount', 
> 'shadowAccount'],
>                 :scope => :one
> end
>
> With a simple search like this:
>
> Account.find(:all, "a b")
>
> i get this error:
>
> Net::LDAP::LdapError: invalid filter syntax


From tommyblue at lilik.it  Tue Jun 30 11:54:18 2009
From: tommyblue at lilik.it (TommyBlue)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:54:18 +0200
Subject: [activeldap-discuss] Spaces problem
In-Reply-To: <4A4A208A.60806@gmail.com>
References: <4A49FB54.6020803@lilik.it> <4A4A208A.60806@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A4A352A.2030305@lilik.it>

ok, thanks for suggest, i'll dig it up! :)

Il 30/06/2009 16:26, Alexey Chebotar ha scritto:
> Hi TommyBlue.
> I think it is problem of Net::LDAP library. I can't reproduce this
> problem with library Ruby/LDAP
>
> I has created new Account from console, and then tried find them:
>
>  >> Account.find(:all, "a b")
> => [#<Account objectClass:<top, inetOrgPerson, posixAccount,
> shadowAccount>, must:<cn, gidNumber, homeDirectory, objectClass, sn,
> uid, uidNumber>, may:<audio, businessCategory, carLicense,
> departmentNumber, description, destinationIndicator, displayName,
> employeeNumber, employeeType, facsimileTelephoneNumber, gecos,
> givenName, homePhone, homePostalAddress, initials,
> internationaliSDNNumber, jpegPhoto, l, labeledURI, loginShell, mail,
> manager, mobile, o, ou, pager, photo, physicalDeliveryOfficeName,
> postOfficeBox, postalAddress, postalCode, preferredDeliveryMethod,
> preferredLanguage, registeredAddress, roomNumber, secretary, seeAlso,
> shadowExpire, shadowFlag, shadowInactive, shadowLastChange, shadowMax,
> shadowMin, shadowWarning, st, street, telephoneNumber,
> teletexTerminalIdentifier, telexNumber, title, uid, userCertificate,
> userPKCS12, userPassword, userSMIMECertificate, x121Address,
> x500UniqueIdentifier>, audio: [], businessCategory: [], carLicense: [],
> cn: ["a b"], commonName: ["a b"], departmentNumber: [], description: [],
> destinationIndicator: [], displayName: [], employeeNumber: [],
> employeeType: [], facsimileTelephoneNumber: [], fax: [], gecos: [],
> gidNumber: [10000], givenName: [], gn: [], homeDirectory: ["/home/ab"],
> homePhone: [], homePostalAddress: [], homeTelephoneNumber: [], initials:
> [], internationaliSDNNumber: [], jpegPhoto: [], l: [], labeledURI: [],
> localityName: [], loginShell: [], mail: [], manager: [], mobile: [],
> mobileTelephoneNumber: [], o: [], objectClass: ["top", "inetOrgPerson",
> "posixAccount", "shadowAccount"], organizationName: [],
> organizationalUnitName: [], ou: [], pager: [], pagerTelephoneNumber: [],
> photo: [], physicalDeliveryOfficeName: [], postOfficeBox: [],
> postalAddress: [], postalCode: [], preferredDeliveryMethod: [],
> preferredLanguage: [], registeredAddress: [], rfc822Mailbox: [],
> roomNumber: [], secretary: [], seeAlso: [], shadowExpire: [],
> shadowFlag: [], shadowInactive: [], shadowLastChange: [], shadowMax: [],
> shadowMin: [], shadowWarning: [], sn: ["A B"], st: [],
> stateOrProvinceName: [], street: [], streetAddress: [], surname: ["A
> B"], telephoneNumber: [], teletexTerminalIdentifier: [], telexNumber:
> [], title: [], uid: ["ab"], uidNumber: [10000], userCertificate: [],
> userPKCS12: [], userPassword: [], userSMIMECertificate: [], userid:
> ["ab"], x121Address: [], x500UniqueIdentifier: []>]
>
> Cut from log file:
>
> LDAP: add (92.0ms): {:dn=>"cn=a b,ou=domains,dc=...,dc=com",
> :attributes=>[[:add, "cn", {"cn"=>["a b"]}], [:add, "objectClass",
> {"objectClass"=>["top", "InetOrgPerson", "posixAccount",
> "shadowAccount"]}], [:add, "uid", {"uid"=>["ab"]}], [:add, "uidNumber",
> {"uidNumber"=>["10000"]}], [:add, "sn", {"sn"=>["A B"]}], [:add,
> "gidNumber", {"gidNumber"=>["10000"]}], [:add, "homeDirectory",
> {"homeDirectory"=>["/home/ab"]}]]}
> LDAP: search (3.9ms): {:base=>"ou=domains,dc=...,dc=com", :scope=>:one,
> :filter=>"(&(cn=a
> b)(&(objectClass=top)(objectClass=InetOrgPerson)(objectClass=posixAccount)(objectClass=shadowAccount)))",
> :attributes=>[]}
>
>> i'm facing problems with spaces in searches. My class uses cn as dn
>> attribute:
>>
>> class Account < ActiveLdap::Base
>> ldap_mapping :dn_attribute => 'cn',
>> :prefix => 'ou=users',
>> :classes => ['top', 'InetOrgPerson', 'posixAccount', 'shadowAccount'],
>> :scope => :one
>> end
>>
>> With a simple search like this:
>>
>> Account.find(:all, "a b")
>>
>> i get this error:
>>
>> Net::LDAP::LdapError: invalid filter syntax
>
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-activeldap-discuss mailing list
> ruby-activeldap-discuss at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-activeldap-discuss


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3622 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ruby-activeldap-discuss/attachments/20090630/f010b683/attachment.bin>