[rspec-users] Mocking expectations on I/O operations
Ash Moran
ash.moran at patchspace.co.uk
Thu Sep 15 06:08:35 EDT 2011
On 15 Sep 2011, at 10:05, Rob Aldred wrote:
> Thanks Justin,
> That isnt working... its erroring with:
>
> The method `delete` was not stubbed or was already unstubbed
Hi Rob
For reasons I could go into, when I'm coding myself I don't usually stub out file system access or other third party systems. Rather, I write an adapter that behaves in the way I expect and test it using the real file system, then test the rest of the system against a mock. That avoids this category of problem.
What you're doing here appears to be mixing both real (from mini_magick) and stubbed (your own library's) calls to filesystem code, and I think it's the asymmetry that's biting you.
I could explain the above in more detail*, but in lieu of that, here's another angle: can you run the code in a subdirectory per image and nuke that after? That way you only have one point to hit for the cleanup.
HTH
Ash
* As a quick example, you might have a TempFileCleaner object in place of IconGenerator#cleanup, seeded with all the potential temp filenames, or some algorithm to figure them out
--
http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashmoran
More information about the rspec-users
mailing list