[rspec-users] need some advice on the best way to structure testable shared methods

Cynthia Kiser cnk at ugcs.caltech.edu
Mon Nov 14 21:22:50 EST 2011


Quoting Patrick J. Collins <patrick at collinatorstudios.com>:
> describe Bar do
>   it_behaves_like "a nameable thingie", Bar.new(nil, nil)
> end
> 
> Which I don't like, mainly because Foo & Bar's initialize methods require
> arguments, and I am having to do (nil, nil) which seems very uncool...

Having trouble following your example. Why do you have to pass
Bar.new(nil, nil) for this test? 

-- 
Cynthia N. Kiser
cnk at ugcs.caltech.edu


More information about the rspec-users mailing list