[rspec-users] need some advice on the best way to structure testable shared methods
Cynthia Kiser
cnk at ugcs.caltech.edu
Mon Nov 14 21:22:50 EST 2011
Quoting Patrick J. Collins <patrick at collinatorstudios.com>:
> describe Bar do
> it_behaves_like "a nameable thingie", Bar.new(nil, nil)
> end
>
> Which I don't like, mainly because Foo & Bar's initialize methods require
> arguments, and I am having to do (nil, nil) which seems very uncool...
Having trouble following your example. Why do you have to pass
Bar.new(nil, nil) for this test?
--
Cynthia N. Kiser
cnk at ugcs.caltech.edu
More information about the rspec-users
mailing list