[rspec-users] Trouble making rspec-rails 2 work with webrat.

Jim Morris wolfmanjm at gmail.com
Tue Nov 30 16:00:53 EST 2010


cool that did fix it. thanks

On Nov 30, 6:34 am, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Jim Morris wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi David,
>
> > I am using the current versions of everything rspec
> > rspec (2.2.0,)
> > rspec-core (2.2.1)
> > rspec-expectations (2.2.0)
> > rspec-mocks (2.2.0,)
> > rspec-rails (2.2.0)
> > webrat (0.7.2)
> > rails(3.0.3)
>
> > webrat is in Gemfile...
>
> > group :test, :development do
> >  gem 'webrat'
> >  gem 'rspec-rails'
> > end
>
> > My spec is meant to be an integration test and as such is in spec/
> > requests
>
> > I have a pretty simple setup, the full source is here...
>
> >https://github.com/wolfmanjm/wolfmanblog_rails
>
> > Thanks for the help, its odd so many people are having issues with
> > webrat, should I cross post to their group or is this an rspec/webrat/
> > rails3 issue?
>
> I'm not sure where the issue is yet (most likely rspec), but I was able to see it by cloning your repo and running the specs.
>
> I was able to get things to work by moving "include Rack::Test::Methods" into the configure block:
>
> RSpec.configure do |config|
>   config.include Rack::Test::Methods
>   ...
> end
>
> You should _not_, however, have to do any such thing, so I'll look into it and if I can address this in rspec-rails I will and have a bug-fix release out soon.
>
> Thanks!
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 29, 2:45 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Nov 29, 2010, at 4:44 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> >>> On Nov 29, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Jim Morris wrote:
>
> >>>> Sorry I may have been unclear....
>
> >>>> When using the default spec_helper as generated from a fresh
> >>>> script/rails generate rspec:install
> >>>> I get the error...
>
> >>>> undefined method `last_response' for
> >>>> #<RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup::Nested_2:0x9da18cc>
>
> >>>> This means something is not seeing the Rack Test stuff.
>
> >>>> The second error is got when I add
>
> >>>> include Rack::Test::Methods
>
> >>>> It now sees last_response but doesn't get a respnose from visit (That
> >>>> may be a different errror).
>
> >>>> So bottom line is using the latest rails/rspec/webrat does not work
> >>>> out of the box.
>
> >>> It does for me, so something is different between our configurations.
>
> >>> Do you have webrat in the Gemfile?
> >>> Is this a controller spec? If so is it in the spec/controllers directory?
>
> >> Also, what version of rspec-rails are we talking about?
>
> >>>> On Nov 29, 7:18 am, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Nov 29, 2010, at 4:58 AM, Jim Morris wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Ok adding
>
> >>>>>> include Rack::Test::Methods
>
> >>>>>> to my spec_helper changed the error to
>
> >>>>>>   Failure/Error: visit "/"
> >>>>>>    No response yet. Request a page first.
> >>>>>>    # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rack-
> >>>>>> test-0.5.6/lib/rack/mock_session.rb:51:in `last_response'
> >>>>>>    # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/
> >>>>>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/adapters/rack.rb:26:in `response'
> >>>>>>    # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/
> >>>>>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/adapters/rack.rb:14:in `response_body'
> >>>>>>    # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/
> >>>>>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/core/session.rb:176:in `exception_caught?'
> >>>>>>    # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/
> >>>>>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/core/session.rb:121:in `request_page'
> >>>>>>    # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/
> >>>>>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/core/session.rb:217:in `visit'
> >>>>>>    # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/
> >>>>>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/core/methods.rb:7:in `visit'
> >>>>>>    # ./spec/requests/basics_spec.rb:5
>
> >>>>>> So someone is not including the rack test stuff, however still don;t
> >>>>>> know why it is failing
>
> >>>>> I'd get rid of all of that stuff from spec_helper. It was guidance from a cucumber-rails issue, not an rspec issue, and is unnecessary with rspec. I'd just re-generate it with "script/rails generate rspec:install"
>
> >>>>> HTH,
> >>>>> David
>
> >>>>>> On Nov 15, 3:36 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Peter Havens wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> I'm having problems getting rspec-rails 2 request specs to work with
> >>>>>>>> webrat. Any help would be appreciated. Here's my setup:
>
> >>>>>>>> ruby 1.9.2p0
> >>>>>>>> rails 3.0.1
> >>>>>>>> rspec-rails 2.1.0
> >>>>>>>> webrat0.7.2
>
> >>>>>>>> Here's the error I'm getting:
>
> >>>>>>>> $ rspec --backtrace spec/requests/ssl_certificate_requests_spec.rb
> >>>>>>>> F
>
> >>>>>>>> Failures:
> >>>>>>>> 1) <text>
> >>>>>>>>    Failure/Error: Unable to find matching line from backtrace
> >>>>>>>>    stack level too deep
> >>>>>>>>    # /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/forwardable.rb:185
>
> >>>>>>>> Finished in 0.49825 seconds
> >>>>>>>> 1 example, 1 failure
>
> >>>>>>>> Here are snippets of my files:
>
> >>>>>>>> # spec/spec_helper.rb
> >>>>>>>> #
> >>>>>>>> # The following is based on  some tips from a cucumber-rails ticket:
> >>>>>>>> require "webrat"
> >>>>>>>> require "webrat/core/matchers"
>
> >>>>>>>> include Rack::Test::Methods
> >>>>>>>> includeWebrat::Methods
> >>>>>>>> includeWebrat::Matchers
>
> >>>>>>>> Webrat.configure do |config|
> >>>>>>>> config.mode = :rack
> >>>>>>>> config.open_error_files = false
> >>>>>>>> end
>
> >>>>>>>> # spec/requests/<file>_spec.rb
> >>>>>>>> require "spec_helper"
>
> >>>>>>>> describe "<text>" do
> >>>>>>>> it "<text>" do
> >>>>>>>>   visit <text>_path
>
> >>>>>>>>   # The following works when uncommented:
> >>>>>>>>   #
> >>>>>>>>   # get <text>_path
> >>>>>>>>   # assert_template '<text>/<text>'
> >>>>>>>> end
> >>>>>>>> end
>
> >>>>>>> This is actually awebratissue, but it is reported to rspec-rails andwebrat:
>
> >>>>>>>https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/issues/140https://webrat.lightho...
>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Pete
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> rspec-users mailing list
> >>>>>>>> rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> >>>>>>>>http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> rspec-users mailing list
> >>>>>>> rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> rspec-users mailing list
> >>>>>> rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> >>>>>>http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> rspec-users mailing list
> >>>>> rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> rspec-users mailing list
> >>>> rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> >>>>http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rspec-users mailing list
> >> rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users


More information about the rspec-users mailing list