[rspec-users] Best practices for managing fixtures outside Rails?...

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Sun May 16 19:16:41 EDT 2010


On May 14, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Stu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a non-Rails Ruby project that uses RSpec.  It needs a shared
> collection of fixture-like objects created, although they have nothing
> to do with Rails, AR or database entries:
> 
> w1 = Widget.new(10)
> w2 = Widget.new(20)
> w3 = Widget.new(30)
> # ...
> 
> g1 = Gadget.new(w1, w2)
> g2 = Gadget.new(w3, w1)
> g3 = Gadget.new(w2, w3)
> #...
> 
> Currently these are in a shared examples.rb file and are brought into
> various *_spec.rb files in a way that feels like a real hack.  I've
> since discovered a fork of Machinist that works with PORO's and allows
> those object to have an initializer with arguments, so I should be
> able to replace the above with machinist blueprints etc.
> 
> I figure I'm not the first person in the world to be using RSpec and
> fixture-like objects in this way, so are there any best practices for
> doing this outside Rails? I've read this a number of times, but it's
> starting to sink in that projects need to manage their specs/tests
> with the same agility and care they devote to the code.
> 
> Any advice much appreciated,
> 
> Stu

I'm not sure there enough people doing this sort of thing and writing about it to have established any conventions or recommended practices. I'd probably just follow the rails conventions here in terms of where blueprints live, etc.

HTH,
David



More information about the rspec-users mailing list