cwdinfo at gmail.com
Mon Mar 29 22:50:27 EDT 2010
On Mar 29, 2010, at 1:04 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Ashley Moran wrote:
>> (2.5) Any reason why the new RSpec module is "Rspec" not "RSpec"? </grammarnazi>
> AFAIK, autoloaders (like in Rails and Autotest), assume a CamelCase convention for class names, which RSpec violates, and Rspec adheres to. If I'm wrong about this, I'd prefer to make it RSpec, since that's the name of the book and all :) Anybody have insights/opinions on this?
If that's the case, RSpec is fine. If not, then classes like CGI are also hosed.
More information about the rspec-users