[rspec-users] Testing only for a redirect

Marcelo de Moraes Serpa celoserpa at gmail.com
Fri Jun 25 19:15:34 EDT 2010


I meant rspec1.x :)

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <
celoserpa at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm still on the Rails 2 era.. so, it worked like a charm with
> response.should be_redirect.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marcelo.
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:33 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:18 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
>>> <celoserpa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hello guys,
>>> >
>>> > Quick question: How could I just test if a redirect was made, without
>>> URL
>>> > whatsoever?
>>>
>>> In rspec-1/rails-2:
>>>
>>> response.should be_redirect
>>>
>>> This is not in rspec-rails-2 yet, so you can just go with the rails
>>> assertion for now:
>>>
>>> assert_response :redirect
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks David! :)
>>
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>> FYI - looks like you can use be_redirect in rspec-rails-2 because the
>> TestResponse object responds to redirect?(). Give it a shot:
>>
>> response.should be_redirect
>>
>> Work?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20100625/d1ef845e/attachment.html>


More information about the rspec-users mailing list