[rspec-users] Should I be using database_cleaner to tear down data in RSpec 2.0 + Rails 3.0?

Brian Cardarella bcardarella at gmail.com
Sat Jun 5 16:20:54 EDT 2010


Ok, something else is going on because I just generated a brand new
app with rspec-2.0.beta.10 and the transactions are working just fine.
Sorry about that, I'll track down the issue.

- Brian

On Jun 5, 4:12 pm, Brian Cardarella <bcardare... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to answer the other question. I am using ActiveRecord.
> Just a greenfield Rails 3.0.0.beta3 app
>
> - Brian
>
> On Jun 5, 3:42 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 5, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Brian Cardarella wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 5, 2:12 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On Jun 5, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Brian Cardarella wrote:
>
> > >>> Subject pretty much asks the question
>
> > >> You _can_, but if you use ActiveRecord and start off with a clean DB, you can use_transactional_examples (alias for use_transactional_fixtures, which defaults to true in beta.10, but will default to false in beta.11).
> > > David,
>
> > > I'm not seeing that behavior.
>
> > > I have beta.10 and without using database_cleaner data is persisting
> > > after each spec and from suite run to suite run. I thought
> > > database_cleaner would resolve the issue but it doesn't seem to.
>
> > I _am_ seeing that behaviour :)
>
> > Are you using AR? What does your spec_helper look like?
>
> > This cucumber feature passes:
>
> >http://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/blob/master/features/model_specs/...
>
> > Not sure what's up, but there is something different about your environment.
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users


More information about the rspec-users mailing list