[rspec-users] Evaluating shared example customisation block before shared block

Ashley Moran ashley.moran at patchspace.co.uk
Sat Jul 31 03:56:03 EDT 2010


On 31 Jul 2010, at 1:10 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:

> You can still get the same outcome, but you have to implement it in the group like this:
> 
> unless defined?(:foo)
>  def foo; "foo"; end
> end

Maybe a DSL method while I'm working on it?  Maybe:

  default_helper(:foo) do
    "foo"
  end

WDYT?


> I think it's a good trade-off to put that burden on the group (and it's author) rather that the consumers of the group.

Agreed, it'd cause a lot of duplication of effort the other way round.


-- 
http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran





More information about the rspec-users mailing list