[rspec-users] set expectation using self in constructor?

Tom Stuart tom at experthuman.com
Fri Jul 16 05:45:53 EDT 2010

On 16 Jul 2010, at 10:29, Matt Wynne wrote:
>> For those following along at home, this exact technique did not work. The +actual_foo+ variable was holding some mock value instead of the real self value.
> Sorry. Do we think this is a bug in rspec? I'd have expected the block to return the last evaluated value. But is that just me?

It doesn't look like a bug to me -- I expect #should_receive to return a message expectation, e.g. so that I can call #with/#and_return on it, and it would seem weird for it to behave otherwise when a block is supplied.


More information about the rspec-users mailing list