[rspec-users] Shoulda and explicit subject

ericindc ericmilford at gmail.com
Thu Jul 1 22:01:16 EDT 2010


http://groups.google.com/group/shoulda/browse_thread/thread/9a19ca5f60285e2d


On Jul 1, 9:47 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 8:40 PM, ericindc wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 1, 3:23 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:00 PM, ericindc wrote:
>
> >>> I am trying to use Shoulda matchers with the latest beta version of
> >>> RSpec for Rails 3.  I've managed to track down the cause of my errors
> >>> to needing to explicitly set the subject, but the Shoulda examples
> >>> make no mention of requiring this step.  I've pastied the errors I'm
> >>> receiving and adding subject { controller } seems to resolve them.  Is
> >>> this behavior expected?
>
> >>>http://pastie.org/1020788
>
> >> Have you tried pinging the shoulda maintainers?
>
> > I have a thread open on their group page as well, but the only
> > response received thus far seems to think it's an RSpec issue.
>
> Link?
>
> > I am having the same issue in my model tests as well.
>
> ps - please bottom and/or inline post. Readhttp://idallen.com/topposting.htmlfor more info.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users


More information about the rspec-users mailing list