[rspec-users] Troubles with route_for
r_j_h_box-sf at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 12 02:06:04 EST 2010
On 1/11/10 9:22 PM, Nick Hoffman wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>> I'd recommend using the route_to matcher that was added in 1.2.9
>> It's more reliable, and aligns better with the rspec matchers API.
> Thanks for that, David. I updated my spec (http://codepad.org/F828X7Fg).
> For some reason though, it's still failing: http://codepad.org/s65Ckubc
> Just in case, this is what I have in routes.rb:
> There must be some tiny detail that I'm missing here...
Yes, there must. I think you've tried to twice define the route, and
the test shows you which one actually is being used. I'll suggest
commenting out one of those routes at a time, and see whether the new
test results are illuminating.
More information about the rspec-users