[rspec-users] should and != operator

Bret Pettichord bret at pettichord.com
Mon Oct 12 17:20:22 EDT 2009


Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
>
> Den 12. okt. 2009 kl. 21.11 skrev Bret Pettichord <bret at pettichord.com>:
>
>> Looks like an rspec bug to me.
>>
> It's not an rspec bug. != is not a method, and therefore can't be 
> treated by rspec. It's a limitation of ruby.
OK. I get it.

Bret


More information about the rspec-users mailing list