[rspec-users] should and != operator

Bret Pettichord bret at pettichord.com
Mon Oct 12 17:20:22 EDT 2009

Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
> Den 12. okt. 2009 kl. 21.11 skrev Bret Pettichord <bret at pettichord.com>:
>> Looks like an rspec bug to me.
> It's not an rspec bug. != is not a method, and therefore can't be 
> treated by rspec. It's a limitation of ruby.
OK. I get it.


More information about the rspec-users mailing list