[rspec-users] should and != operator

Bret Pettichord bret at pettichord.com
Mon Oct 12 15:11:07 EDT 2009


Looks like an rspec bug to me.

Bret

Willy Mene wrote:
> I've tried searching around for something describing how the #should 
> method works with the != operator, but couldn't find anything 
> conclusive.  Can someone please explain while the following lines will 
> pass if placed into an rspec example?
>
> it "should fail but passes" do
>   [].should != []
>   'some string'.should != 'some string'
> end
>
> Thanks!
> Willy
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>



More information about the rspec-users mailing list