[rspec-users] should and != operator
bret at pettichord.com
Mon Oct 12 15:11:07 EDT 2009
Looks like an rspec bug to me.
Willy Mene wrote:
> I've tried searching around for something describing how the #should
> method works with the != operator, but couldn't find anything
> conclusive. Can someone please explain while the following lines will
> pass if placed into an rspec example?
> it "should fail but passes" do
> .should != 
> 'some string'.should != 'some string'
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users