[rspec-users] [BDD] View specs and cucumber -- duplication of effort?
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 20:30:38 EST 2009
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Stephen Eley <sfeley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Premdas <apremdas at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Personally I now think nested steps are evil - but thats another story :)
> It sounds like an entertaining one. I'd love to hear why sometime.
> (Though whether the right place for it would be here or the Cucumber
> list, I couldn't say.)
I'll pipe in since it's here on this list at the moment:
I won't go as far as to say that nested steps are evil, but I don't really
like to use them myself because they do conflate two levels of abstraction.
I'd sooner have two steps delegate to a helper than one step delegate to
> > Having said all this I haven't actually done this in practice yet, going
> > try it on my next view.
> Please share what you find out. Particularly if you discover a way to
> do them that doesn't make them feel like more work. >8->
> > By the way its nice to find a fellow soul who appreciates the wonderfully
> > expressive power of the word 'wibble'!
> Of course! They wobble, but they don't fall down. >8->
> Have Fun,
> Steve Eley (sfeley at gmail.com)
> ESCAPE POD - The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rspec-users