[rspec-users] [Cucumber] Fail a scenario from After or AfterStep

aslak hellesoy aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com
Wed May 20 04:33:29 EDT 2009


>
> On 20 May 2009, at 00:04, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>
>>> Any further thoughts on this, Aslak? I'd prefer to go with a solution in
>>> line with the future direction of Cucumber if possible.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, forgot to get back to you Luke.
>>
>> I'm convinced. We'll add an AfterStep hook. Do you want to give a stab
>> at a patch? Start by writing a feature - see
>> features/after_block_exceptions.feature for a good example of the
>> style we like...
>
> Can I make a mild plea for After(:step) rather than AfterStep? I think it
> looks nicer and it's one less method added to the API...
>

That would be confusing, since After already takes arguments (tags).

Aslak

> Matt Wynne
> http://beta.songkick.com
> http://blog.mattwynne.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>


More information about the rspec-users mailing list