[rspec-users] Having a problem with new webrat matchers in cucumber 2
lists at ruby-forum.com
Fri Mar 20 11:52:42 EDT 2009
James Byrne wrote:
> Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
>> We switched to using response.should contain(text) a while back. This is
>> just a wrapper around Rails' assert_contain, the preferred (I think) way
>> to check for text on a page.
I am thinking that you are right. This particular feature was written
back when I was first starting out with cucumber, features and steps and
BDD. I have since taken to checking for specific css ids relating to
messages and notices in steps rather than looking for the text itself.
I likely will refactor this step to do the same.
I think, if it is not already on the wiki, that cucumber users might be
encouraged to put any local additions to support/env.rb into a separate
file like support/local_env.rb. Running script/generate cucumber to
upgrade an existing project leaves those with customized env.rb files
with two equally unappealing alternatives; keep the old and forgo the
new or replace it entirely.
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
More information about the rspec-users