[rspec-users] RSpec style and truthiness
rick.denatale at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 10:39:52 EDT 2009
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Stephen Eley <sfeley at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/3/19 Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale at gmail.com>:
> > Even 'should be' is a bit grating. I'm tempted to write a pair of
> > like be_truthy and be_falsy, but I was wondering what other RSpec users
> > to say.
> should be || should_not be: that is the expectation:
> Whether 'tis nobler in the parser to interpret
Alas, poor Eley! I knew him Chelmsky.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rspec-users