[rspec-users] RSpec style and truthiness

Rick DeNatale rick.denatale at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 10:39:52 EDT 2009

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Stephen Eley <sfeley at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2009/3/19 Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale at gmail.com>:
> > Even 'should be' is a bit grating.  I'm tempted to write a pair of
> matchers
> > like be_truthy and be_falsy, but I was wondering what other RSpec users
> have
> > to say.
> should be || should_not be: that is the expectation:
> Whether 'tis nobler in the parser to interpret

Alas, poor Eley!  I knew him Chelmsky.

Rick DeNatale

Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20090320/2472d354/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the rspec-users mailing list