[rspec-users] RSpec style and truthiness

Pat Maddox pat.maddox at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 02:49:50 EDT 2009


On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:42 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Stephen Eley <sfeley at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/3/19 Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale at gmail.com>:
>>> Even 'should be' is a bit grating.  I'm tempted to write a pair of matchers
>>> like be_truthy and be_falsy, but I was wondering what other RSpec users have
>>> to say.
>>
>
> what_follows.should be_brilliant

ugh I think you've just reopened the debate over whether we ought to
use should/is/must/etc

:)

That was fantastic Stephen, thanks!


More information about the rspec-users mailing list