[rspec-users] Cucumber - RSpec matcher
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Mon Mar 9 17:30:14 EDT 2009
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:48 PM, James Byrne <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>> No, no, no :)
>> 5.should == 5
>> 6.should be > 5
>> Read them aloud and they.should make(:sense).
> Perhaps it is my dialect, but what is wrong with:
> "5 should be equal to 5"
> which generally is how I read "=="? Actually, I tend to read "==" (in
> Ruby) as "is equal to".
Really? Are we still debating this?
More information about the rspec-users