[rspec-users] Cucumber - RSpec matcher

[David Chelimsky]

On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:48 PM, James Byrne <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
>> No, no, no :)
>>
>> 5.should == 5
>> 6.should be > 5
>>
>> Read them aloud and they.should make(:sense).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David
>
> Perhaps it is my dialect, but what is wrong with:
>
>   "5 should be equal to 5"
>
> which generally is how I read "=="?  Actually, I tend to read "==" (in
> Ruby) as "is equal to".

Really? Are we still debating this?