[rspec-users] have_tag + quantity - question

MAwiniarski MAwiniarski at gmail.com
Sat Mar 7 02:35:17 EST 2009


Thanks.

On 6 Mar, 23:42, Pat Nakajima <patnakaj... at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've posted it on this list before, but if you're writing view tests, check
> out Elementor:http://pivotallabs.com/users/patn/blog/articles/608-better-view-testi....
> It provides a much cleaner way of asserting on markup, and doesn't require
> you to litter your expectations with CSS selectors.
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Stephen Eley <sfe... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:55 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:40 AM, MAwiniarski <MAwiniar... at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >> Is there a way to check quantity of tags?
>
> > > response.should have_tag('div', 4)
>
> > Ooh!  Thank you; I wish I'd known that before.  All this time I've
> > been using annoyingly complicated xpath tests:
>
> > Then /^I should see (\d+) people$/ do |num|
> >  response.should
> > have_xpath("//*[count(*[contains(@class,'person')])=#{num}]")
> > end
>
> > --
> > Have Fun,
> >   Steve Eley (sfe... at gmail.com)
> >   ESCAPE POD - The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine
> >  http://www.escapepod.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users


More information about the rspec-users mailing list