[rspec-users] Should deleting code require failing specs?
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Wed Jul 15 18:21:38 EDT 2009
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Adam Anderson<adamandersonis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sometimes when features are asked to be removed it doesn't make sense to
> specify that they shouldn't be there. It seems to me that removing something
> from a tested app should not entail writing a failing spec for that change.
> I'm curious if people have different opinions or insights on this.
I'd generally not spec the absence of a pre-existing feature, but I
think it depends on the nature of the app and the associated risk of
clients (human or other systems) trying to access services that no
More information about the rspec-users