[rspec-users] Cucumber Scenario Outlines Output Insufficient

[Andrew Premdas]

It took a little time :)

2009/1/18 Aslak Hellesøy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com>

>
>
> Den 18. jan.. 2009 kl. 16.11 skrev Andrew Premdas <apremdas at gmail.com>:
>
> My problem doesn't seem to be covered by these tickets
>
>
> You still haven't given us a concrete example of what you think is useful
> output. Are you going to?
>
> Aslak
>
> 2009/1/17 Joseph Wilk < <joe at josephwilk.net>joe at josephwilk.net>
>
>> aslak hellesoy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Andrew Premdas < <apremdas at gmail.com>
>>> apremdas at gmail.com <mailto: <apremdas at gmail.com>apremdas at gmail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    I'm having problems knowing what a scenario outline I've created
>>>    is doing. In particular I have no idea about what steps are being
>>>    matched when the outline is run so when I break something I can't
>>>    find out what is wrong. Is there any progress on getting better
>>>    output for scenario outlines.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I identified a problem with hidden output for pending steps in scenario
>> outlines in this ticket:
>>
>> <http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211/tickets/57-scenario-templates-to-allow-for-terse-scenario-tables>
>> http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211/tickets/57-scenario-templates-to-allow-for-terse-scenario-tables
>>
>> I've create a new ticket for this.
>>
>> <http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211-cucumber/tickets/163-hidden-pending-status-with-output-when-using-scenario-outlines>
>> http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211-cucumber/tickets/163-hidden-pending-status-with-output-when-using-scenario-outlines
>>
>> If this does not fit your problem please as Aslak said give us an example
>> of the problem.
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Joseph Wilk
>>  <http://blog.josephwilk.net>http://blog.josephwilk.net
>>
>>
>>  It would be immensly helpful if you could give some examples of what kind
>>> of output you think is better.
>>>
>>> Aslak
>>>
>>>
>>>    TIA
>>>
>>>    Andrew
>>>
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>    rspec-users mailing list
>>>     <rspec-users at rubyforge.org>rspec-users at rubyforge.org <mailto:<rspec-users at rubyforge.org>
>>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org>
>>>     <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users>
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Aslak (::)
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>>  <rspec-users at rubyforge.org>rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>>>  <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users>
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>>  <rspec-users at rubyforge.org>rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>>  <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users>
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20090118/148d6da4/attachment.html>