[rspec-users] Help with regexp in matcher
aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com
Tue Jan 13 12:57:03 EST 2009
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Mark Wilden <mark at mwilden.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:41 AM, James Byrne <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:
>> Logins are a pervasive feature of this application and so, rather than
>> waste effort on policing the feature syntax, I thought it best just to
>> accommodate the likely variations from the start.
> Premature flexibility is one of the roots of all evil. :)
> Seriously, your code has two types of users. Yes, you should make writing
> features easier for biz, but you should also make reading steps easier for
> dev. Given that, I like the suggestion of explicitly enumerating the choices
> of verbiage. A clear pointer toward that choice is the comment. A comment is
> an apology for unclear code. All unclear code should be commented, but
> unclear code should be avoided whenever possible.
Another principle that calls for a more rigid Regex:
Everybody should speak the same language and know what it means. Having 4
different ways of saying the same thing will just add to confusion.
> All IMO, of course.
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rspec-users