[rspec-users] [cucumber] Cucumber and CI
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Sun Feb 22 19:18:54 EST 2009
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Yi Wen <hayafirst at gmail.com> wrote:
> I totally agree with you on this. I have a feeling a lot of people kind of
> use cucumber as a sexy way for doing waterfall.
That may be so, but one view of agile is that each iteration is a
mini-waterfall. BDD suggests that we *should* define all of the
scenarios in the iteration planning meeting because we use them as a
planning tool (how can we estimate a feature at all before we've
talked about the acceptance criteria?).
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mark Wilden <mark at mwilden.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:36 PM, aslak hellesoy
>> <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > You don't have to write all
>> > scenarios when you start working on a feature. I recommend you never
>> > have more than one yellow scenario at a time.
>> Whereas I use scenarios as a "to-do" list. I'll keep adding them as I
>> think of them or as they come up in discussion.
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users