[rspec-users] have_tag with a block
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Tue Feb 3 21:01:50 EST 2009
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:52 PM, MarkMT <mark.thomson at ieee.org> wrote:
> This is really a webrat question, but I haven't had any reaction to
> this from the webrat group. Maybe someone here can offer a comment...
> I've been fooling around with webrat view matchers in merb / cucumber
> and I'm trying to figure out whether the block parameter in have_tag
> actually does anything. I've tried passing a block with pure nonsense
> in it and the interpreter just seems to accept it and ignore it as if
> it doesn't exist.
> Initially I had hoped there was something like 'with_tag' you could
> nest inside a block, but I guess that was a rails thing. However from
> my quick look at the code, although with fairly limited ruby
> experience, I got the impression that 'have_tag' passes any matching
> markup it finds into the block as a parameter. But none of my
> experiments have been able to confirm this.
> Does anyone have first hand knowledge of / successful experience with
> have_tag with a block?
Not first hand experience, but I'm looking at the specs in webrat:
If you scroll down to describe "#have_tag", you'll see a couple of
examples. It looks like your instinct is at least close to correct.
Can you post an example of what you're trying to do?
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users