[rspec-users] no should raise_exception
rogerpack2005 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 29 10:26:24 EST 2009
> So we're going to leave it as raise_error for now. If you'd like to push on
> this (which you're welcome to), please add a ticket to lighthouse so it's
> easy to find the discussions around it. If we can get general consensus that
> this would be a good move in spite of the negatives I just outlined, I'm
> happy to do it.
All righty let the voting begin.
My current leaning is actually (re a previous comment), to add a new
method raise_exception, which requires them to pass in the
ExceptionClass to be raised, but feel free to discuss this suggestion
at the ticket above.
More information about the rspec-users