[rspec-users] Cucumber ".should contain(expected) does but fails anyway

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Thu Apr 23 16:18:46 EDT 2009

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:17 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:16 PM, James Byrne <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:
>> David Chelimsky wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, James Byrne <lists at ruby-forum.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> David Chelimsky wrote:
>>>>> I'd rather always define our own so the results are consistent from
>>>>> RSpec regardless of other frameworks in the midst. Does that make
>>>>> sense to you?
>>>> Instead of metaclass how about object_handle ?
>>>> wdt?
>>> Go for it. I think that's good enough for now. It's for internal
>>> consumption only. Also, I'm better at making naming decisions when I
>>> see things in context, I may change it later if I come up w/ something
>>> that speaks to me more clearly.
>>> Good?
>> OK.  I have made the changes to the code in a local branch.  I just need
>> to stick the object_handle method in the right place and get the revised
>> specs to pass.  I should have a patch for you tomorrow. If not, then by
>> Monday.
> Cool. I may need to get a release out before the weekend due to other
> pressures, so this might not make it until the next release, but that
> won't be too far off.

BTW - FWIW, this is a classic example of how OSS should work. User
gets frustrated. User solves problem through contribution. Thanks for

> Thanks James,
> David
>> --
>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

More information about the rspec-users mailing list