[rspec-users] Cucumber ".should contain(expected) does but fails anyway
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Thu Apr 23 16:17:42 EDT 2009
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:16 PM, James Byrne <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, James Byrne <lists at ruby-forum.com>
>>> David Chelimsky wrote:
>>>> I'd rather always define our own so the results are consistent from
>>>> RSpec regardless of other frameworks in the midst. Does that make
>>>> sense to you?
>>> Instead of metaclass how about object_handle ?
>> Go for it. I think that's good enough for now. It's for internal
>> consumption only. Also, I'm better at making naming decisions when I
>> see things in context, I may change it later if I come up w/ something
>> that speaks to me more clearly.
> OK. I have made the changes to the code in a local branch. I just need
> to stick the object_handle method in the right place and get the revised
> specs to pass. I should have a patch for you tomorrow. If not, then by
Cool. I may need to get a release out before the weekend due to other
pressures, so this might not make it until the next release, but that
won't be too far off.
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users