[rspec-users] Cucumber ".should contain(expected) does but fails anyway

James Byrne lists at ruby-forum.com
Thu Apr 23 16:16:15 EDT 2009

David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, James Byrne <lists at ruby-forum.com> 
> wrote:
>> David Chelimsky wrote:
>>> I'd rather always define our own so the results are consistent from
>>> RSpec regardless of other frameworks in the midst. Does that make
>>> sense to you?
>> Instead of metaclass how about object_handle ?
>> wdt?
> Go for it. I think that's good enough for now. It's for internal
> consumption only. Also, I'm better at making naming decisions when I
> see things in context, I may change it later if I come up w/ something
> that speaks to me more clearly.
> Good?

OK.  I have made the changes to the code in a local branch.  I just need 
to stick the object_handle method in the right place and get the revised 
specs to pass.  I should have a patch for you tomorrow. If not, then by 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

More information about the rspec-users mailing list