[rspec-users] Cucumber ".should contain(expected) does but fails anyway
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Thu Apr 23 15:00:49 EDT 2009
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:56 PM, James Byrne <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>> I don't think we should call it metaclass though, but I'm not sure
>> what I *do* want to call it. Metaclass != eigenclass, which is what
>> this really is, so maybe eigenclass.rb - don't let that hang you up
>> though, I can always change the names after.
> The thing is, Rails already defines #metaclass. So, I thought to check
> for that method before extending Object with my own. If
> Object.respond_to? :metaclass == true then we are in Rails, or some
> other framework that provides the same thing, and so we need not provide
> our own. Otherwise we add it.
I'd rather always define our own so the results are consistent from
RSpec regardless of other frameworks in the midst. Does that make
sense to you?
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users