[rspec-users] Cucumber ".should contain(expected) does but fails anyway

[James Byrne]

David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> 
> I don't think we should call it metaclass though, but I'm not sure
> what I *do* want to call it. Metaclass != eigenclass, which is what
> this really is, so maybe eigenclass.rb - don't let that hang you up
> though, I can always change the names after.
> 

The thing is, Rails already defines #metaclass.  So, I thought to check 
for that method before extending Object with my own. If 
Object.respond_to? :metaclass == true then we are in Rails, or some 
other framework that provides the same thing, and so we need not provide 
our own.  Otherwise we add it.

Comments?
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.