zach.dennis at gmail.com
Tue Sep 30 08:57:18 EDT 2008
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Andy Freeman <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> Are you willing to provide a simple example?
I'm using the same example as the articled you linked to originally as
the base. This way you should be able to clearly see the differences.
> Matt Wynne wrote:
>> We do something similar to this, though we use a convention to set
>> @klass to the class being spec'd in the top-level example group,
>> rather than deriving it as they do in that sample.
>> In view specs we also use a convention to always have a do_render
>> method available, so that we can bring in similarly shared / generated
>> It's great for speccing two sublcasses which have some common
>> behaviour, where it feels wrong to spec the (abstract) base class.
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users