[rspec-users] Not seeing an RJS change

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Mon Sep 29 12:34:34 EDT 2008


On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Nick Hoffman <nick at deadorange.com> wrote:
> On 2008-09-29, at 07:58, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Nick Hoffman <nick at deadorange.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2008-09-28, at 17:20, Nick Hoffman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 431         it 'should hide the map filter errors <div>' do
>>>> 432           do_xhr @xhr_params
>>>> 433           response.should have_rjs
>>>> 434 #          response.should have_rjs(:hide, 'map-filter-errors')
>>>> 435         end
>>>
>>> I just discovered that I need to pass :chained_replace_html to #have_rjs
>>> ,
>>> like so:
>>> response.should have_rjs(:chained_replace_html, :hide,
>>> 'map-filter-errors')
>>>
>>> However, after googling around and looking through the source for
>>> #assert_select_rjs , I have no idea what :chained_replace_html does, nor
>>> why
>>> :hide is insufficient. Would someone mind enlightening me?
>>
>> I'm not sure why that is offhand, still waking up this fine Monday
>> morning, but I'd recommend throwing this question to the rails mailing
>> list if nobody responds here.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David
>
> Hi David. I've taken your advice and posted to the ror-talk list:
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk/browse_thread/thread/f7fc3f63660a7f33
>
> I'm not sure what you meant by "why that is offhand"...

That's a common US expression meaning "without looking into it" or
"off the top of my head".

:)

>
> Cheers,
> Nick
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>


More information about the rspec-users mailing list