[rspec-users] BDD / cucumber thought - chaining 'Then' steps with Which
matt at mattwynne.net
Fri Sep 26 09:06:36 EDT 2008
On 26 Sep 2008, at 13:59, Josh Chisholm wrote:
> Stories without shared state feel clunky to me, because we would
> never speak that way.
> I also had a similar urge, don't know if it's a "programmer" urge:
> Given a user
> With the name 'josh'
> And the password 'sesame'
> ...so I don't end up with an explosion of steps for 'a user with
> x', 'a user with y', 'a user with x and y' .
> So there are named things, but we also often want to refer to the
> anonymous "last mentioned thing" like we do in speech. So I end up
> doing things like this sometimes:
> Given /a user/ do
> shared_state["he"] = shared_state["she"] = shared_state["it"] =
> ...is that bad?
FWIW, I think it's rather nice. We went through a fad of using @it
for a while, and now we have a stuff hash. Both similar ideas -
there must be something in this.
Aslak, I'd love to hear a war story about how shared state bit you in
the arse to give this debate some balance.
In case you wondered: The opinions expressed in this email are my own
and do not necessarily reflect the views of any former, current or
future employers of mine.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rspec-users