[rspec-users] After a step fails, if successive steps have been executed and passed, cucumber reports them as skipped

David Chelimsky dchelimsky at gmail.com
Thu Oct 30 15:32:26 EDT 2008

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Stephen Eley <sfeley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:07 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is absolutely by design. If a step passes or fails after another
>> has failed, you have no way of knowing if it would still pass or fail
>> once the other one is passing. Cucumber reports the first problem in a
>> scenario so you can fix that one and move on.
> I'm curious: what's the logic behind it not just stopping there?

Pending steps (post failure) are still reported as pending, so it
gives you a sense of where you are in process. Make sense?

> --
> Have Fun,
>   Steve Eley (sfeley at gmail.com)
>   ESCAPE POD - The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine
>   http://www.escapepod.org
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

More information about the rspec-users mailing list