[rspec-users] can I get more details in the "rake spec" output (e.g. for eql fail, what was the actual value that was returned)???
greg.hauptmann.ruby at gmail.com
Tue Oct 7 00:25:40 EDT 2008
here's some examples:
'Recurring.add_projections: weekly & non-reconcile & starting in past should
update balances appropriately' FAILED
expected 1001, got #<BigDecimal:22a68d4,'0.1E4',4(12)> (using .eql?)
==> Oh, actually seems to work but gives the figure in Engineering notation
- I wonder if there's a way to improve the readability here?
'Recurring.add projections (perform credit card payment) should calculate
amount based on offset provided' FAILED
expected no Exception, got #<RuntimeError: It should display this exception>
==> Actually does show exception name, but doesn't give a back trace? Is
there a way to see the back trace if required?
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Pat Maddox <pergesu at gmail.com> wrote:
> What are you currently seeing? afaik, you should currently see all the
> dots and a few F's when specs fail, and then after that you'll see
> detailed failure messages including backtraces.
> "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.ruby at gmail.com> writes:
> > Hi,
> > Can I get more details in the "rake spec" output (e.g. for eql fail, what
> was the actual value that was returned)??? Another example might be what the
> > actually is in a case the "should not raise exception" fails...
> > Regards
> > Greg
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rspec-users