dchelimsky at gmail.com
Wed Oct 1 00:46:27 EDT 2008
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Andy Freeman <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Zach Dennis <zach.dennis at gmail.com>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Andy Freeman <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:
>>>>> Are you willing to provide a simple example?
>>>> I'm using the same example as the articled you linked to originally as
>>>> the base. This way you should be able to clearly see the differences.
>> Here's a variation on that with a helper for defining macros that I'm
>> thinking of adding to rspec. Lemme know what you think:
> What's not to like?! Despite the fact that a new RSpec version was just
> released, it would be nice to see a new version released right away with
> this concept built in so that a RSpec version of Shoulda could start
> rolling. :)
Not quite sure how we got from discussing an idea to release planning,
but the idea of a shoulda-like library built on this is a good one. If
you're planning on writing one, no need to wait for this to appear in
rspec. It's 3 lines of code that you could include in such a library
until such time as it is released w/ RSpec.
More information about the rspec-users