[rspec-users] class << self considered harmful... really?
matt at mattwynne.net
Tue Nov 25 13:04:23 EST 2008
On 25 Nov 2008, at 17:54, Mark Wilden wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Matt Wynne <matt at mattwynne.net>
> Surely, as soon as they scroll off the screen, it's time to factor
> that code off into a module or class of its own though?
> That's assuming there are a lot of class methods. There might be
> only one, but if that 'class << self' is off the screen, there's the
> potential for confusion (among noobs and gurus alike). In many if
> not most cases I've seen, there were no counterbalancing benefits.
I don't understand. If it's off the screen, it's off the screen,
whether it's defined using self.foo or class << self; def foo; end;
What have I missed?
> For more, see The Ruby Programming Language for their take.
I didn't know about that book! Cheers for the recommendation :)
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the rspec-users